Evidence mapPaperPMID 8462157Full record

ArticleCirculation1993

Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

N H Pijls, J A van Son, R L Kirkeeide, B De Bruyne, K L Gould

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 276 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
276citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05392959 phase4terminatedstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Antidiabetic Drug DAPAgliflozin on the Coronary Macrovascular and MICROvascular Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Ran2022Enrolled4Registered outcomes3Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsDapagliflozin 10 mg Tab, Placebo
Open the trial in the graph
NCT01046409 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Clinical, Electrical and Physiologic Significance Between Main Branch and Side Branch Vessels

TypeobservationalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2010 to 2011Enrolled51ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsMeasuring collateral flow
NCT02809157 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Non-invasive Fractional Flow Reserve CT (FFRCT) Scan for the Study of Coronary Vaso-motion

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Heart Centre SingaporeRan2014 to 2017Enrolled10ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
NCT04037163 completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

CCTA-FFR Registry for Development of Comprehensive Risk Prediction Model

TypeobservationalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2010 to 2019Enrolled747ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsFractional flow reserve, Coronary CT angiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

276 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

216 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N H PijlsDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J A van Son
R L Kirkeeide
B De Bruyne
K L Gould
Catharina Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeverity of coronary artery stenosis has been defined in terms of geometric dimensions, pressure gradient-flow relations, resistance to flow and coronary flow reserve, or maximum flow capacity after maximum arteriolar vasodilation. A direct relation between coronary pressure and flow, however, may only be presumed if the resistances in the coronary circulation are constant (and minimal) as theoretically is the case during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. In that case, pressure measurements theoretically can be used to predict maximum flow and assess functional stenosis severity. METHODS AND

resultsA theoretical model was developed for the different components of the coronary circulation, and a set of equations was derived by which the relative maximum flow or fractional flow reserve in both the stenotic epicardial artery and the myocardial vascular bed and the proportional contribution of coronary arterial and collateral flow to myocardial blood flow are calculated from measurements of arterial, distal coronary, and central venous pressures during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. To test this model, five dogs were acutely instrumented with an epicardial, coronary Doppler flow velocity transducer. Distal coronary pressures were measured by an ultrathin pressure-monitoring guide wire (0.015 in.) with minimal influence on transstenotic pressure gradient. Fractional flow reserve was calculated from the pressure measurements and compared with relative maximum coronary artery flow measured directly by the Doppler flowmeter at three different levels of arterial pressure for each of 12 different severities of stenosis at each pressure level. Relative maximum blood flow through the stenotic artery (Qs) measured directly by the Doppler flowmeter showed an excellent correlation with the pressure-derived values of Qs (r = 0.98 +/- 0.01, intercept = 0.02 +/- 0.03, slope = 0.98 +/- 0.04), of the relative maximum myocardial flow (r = 0.98 +/- 0.02, intercept = 0.26 +/- 0.07, slope = 0.73 +/- 0.08), and of the collateral blood flow (r = 0.96 +/- 0.04, intercept = 0.24 +/- 0.07, slope = -0.24 +/- 0.06). Moreover, the theoretically predicted constant relation between mean arterial pressure and coronary wedge pressure, both corrected for venous pressure, was confirmed experimentally (r = 0.97 +/- 0.03, intercept = 9.5 +/- 13.3, slope = 4.4 +/- 1.2).

conclusionsThese results provide the experimental basis for determining relative maximum flow or fractional flow reserve of both the epicardial coronary artery and the myocardium, including collateral flow, from pressure measurements during maximum arteriolar vasodilation. With a suitable guide wire for reliably measuring distal coronary pressure clinically, this method may have potential applications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for assessing changes in the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses and for estimating collateral flow achievable during occlusion of the coronary artery.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureCentral Venous PressureCollateral CirculationConstriction, PathologicCoronary CirculationCoronary DiseaseDogsModels, CardiovascularModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID8462157
OpenAlexW2001110351

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.