Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8662195›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics1996

Developmental- and tissue-specificity of RNA editing in mitochondria of suspension-cultured maize cells and seedlings.

D Grosskopf, R M Mulligan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Higher plant mitochondriaThe Plant cell · 1999
    Article
  11. Cell type-specific loss of atp6 RNA editing in cytoplasmic male sterile Sorghum bicolor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1997
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D GrosskopfDepartment of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717, USA.
R M Mulligan
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C to U editing of apt9, nad3, and cox2 mRNAs was investigated in maize seedlings at various developmental stages as well as in suspension-cultured cells. Heterogeneity of mRNAs that result from incomplete editing was analyzed for each gene and from five tissues or developmental conditions. The editing status of approximately 30 cDNA clones was determined by digestion with a restriction enzyme that discriminates between unedited and edited DNA sequences. The atp9 and spliced cox2 cDNAs were essentially completely edited in all samples examined. Analysis of three editing sites of nad3 cDNAs indicated that incompletely edited cDNAs were detected in all tissues and treatments with a temporal increase in the overall editing status, from 50% at 3 days to about 75% at 7 days. These results indicate that incompletely edited mRNAs are prevalent for some plant mitochondrial genes, and can change with developmental or growth conditions.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceDNA, ComplementaryDNA, PlantMitochondriaMolecular Sequence DataRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantTissue DistributionZea maysDNA, ComplementaryDNA, PlantRNA, MessengerRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID8662195
OpenAlexW2060377579

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.