Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8790296›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology1996

A promiscuous chloroplast DNA fragment is transcribed in plant mitochondria but the encoded RNA is not edited.

P Zeltz, K Kadowaki, N Kubo, R M Maier, A Hirai, H Kössel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P ZeltzInstitut für Biologie III, Freiburg, Germany.
K Kadowaki
N Kubo
R M Maier
A Hirai
H Kössel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RNA editing processes in chloroplasts and mitochondira of higher plants show several similarities which are suggestive of common components and/or biochemical steps between the two plant organelles. The existence of various promiscuous DNA fragments of chloroplast origin in plant mitochondrial genomes allowed us to test the possibility that chloroplast sequences are also edited in mitochondria. An rpoB fragment transferred from chloroplasts to mitochondria in rice was chosen as it contains several editing sites, two of which match sequence motifs surrounding even non-homologous editing sites in both chloroplast and mitochondrial transcripts. Rice chloroplast and mitochondrial rpoB DNA and cDNA sequences were selectively amplified and the editing status of the cDNA sequences was determined. Three of the four potential rpoB editing sites previously detected in maize were found to be edited in the rice chloroplast rpoB transcript, whereas the fourth was found to remain unedited. In mitochondria, however, all four editing sites remain unmodified at the cDNA level. This indicates that the editing processes of higher plant mitochondria and chloroplasts are not identical and that organelle-specific factors are required for eliciting the respective editing events.

Indexed as

RNA EditingTranscription, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceBlotting, NorthernChloroplastsDNA, ChloroplastDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesMitochondriaMolecular Sequence DataOryzaPlant ProteinsRestriction MappingDNA, ChloroplastDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesPlant ProteinsRNA, ChloroplastRpoB protein, Oryza sativa

Identifiers

PMID8790296

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.