Evidence mapPaperPMID 9306145Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cardiac imaging1997

Additional luminal area gain by intravascular ultrasound guidance after coronary stent implantation with high inflation pressure.

G S Werner, J Diedrich, S Schünemann, O Gastmann, M Ferrari, A B Buchwald, H R Figulla, H Kreuzer

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cardiac imaging, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G S WernerDepartment of Cardiology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
J Diedrich
S Schünemann
O Gastmann
M Ferrari
A B Buchwald
H R Figulla
H Kreuzer
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsStudies by intravascular ultrasound demonstrated inadequate expansion in a large number of stents, which lead to the increase of inflation pressure for stenting. The present study examined whether routine use of high-pressure inflation would be sufficient for an optimum stent expansion without sonographic guidance. METHODS AND

resultsTwo types of single coronary stents (Palmaz-Schatz in 54, and Wiktor in 25) were implanted with inflation pressures of 16-20 atm in 79 nonocclusive coronary lesions. IVUS before stenting was used in 78% to select the adequate stent size. Intravascular ultrasound after stenting was used to asses the minimum stent are and diameter, the reference areas, and the strut apposition to the vessel wall. The difference between the area of the expanding balloon and the stent area was calculated as the luminal deficit of the stent. Completeness of stent expansion required full strut apposition and lesion coverage, and a minimum stent area that was larger than the distal reference, and larger than 60% of the proximal reference. Intravascular ultrasound before stenting lead to an increase of the stent size in 47%. After high-pressure expansion, even with the optimized balloon size, 8% of stents had struts protruding into the lumen. The stent area (6.87 +/- 1.93 mm2) was significantly smaller than both the proximal (9.59 +/- 2.91 mm2; p < 0.001) and distal reference area (8.23 +/- 3.03 mm2; p < 0.001). The criteria for complete expansion were met in 48%. The expansion with a larger high-pressure balloon in 28 stents lead to an increase of the stent area by 19% (8.19 +/- 2.24; p < 0.001), and full stent apposition in all cases. The criteria of stent expansion were met in 82%. A wide range of the luminal deficit upto 48% was observed, which was not related to sonographic lesion characteristics, except in lesions with complete circumferential calcifications. The different stent designs were characterized by a slightly lower luminal deficit in slotted-tube stents (23 +/- 13% vs. 28 +/- 12%; p = 0.11) and a better index of stent symmetry as compared with the coil stent (0.87 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.82 +/- 0.09; p < 0.05).

conclusionRoutine use of high-pressure stent expansion did not lead to a sufficient stent expansion, even when the initial stent size had been guided by intravascular ultrasound. Further stent dilatation with larger balloons under ultrasound guidance would be required to optimize the luminal area gain.

Indexed as

StentsUltrasonography, InterventionalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisAngioplasty, BalloonChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPressureProsthesis ImplantationSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID9306145
OpenAlexW237090320

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.