Evidence mapPaperPMID 9508530Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences1998

Effects of ursodeoxycholate and other bile salts on levels of rat intestinal alkaline sphingomyelinase: a potential implication in tumorigenesis.

R D Duan, Y Cheng, H D Tauschel, A Nilsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. VSL#3 probiotic upregulates intestinal mucosal alkaline sphingomyelinase and reduces inflammation.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R D DuanDepartment of Cell Biology 1, University Hospital of Lund, Sweden.
Y Cheng
H D Tauschel
A Nilsson
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies showed that bile salts had a promoting effect on colon cancer development and this effect was inhibited by ursodeoxycholate (UDC). We recently found that both human colorectal adenomas and carcinomas were associated with a specific decrease in alkaline sphingomyelinase activity. In this work, we compared the effects of ursodeoxycholate and other bile salts on the levels of rat intestinal alkaline sphingomyelinase both in the intestinal loops and after oral administration. Bile salts at different concentrations were injected into intestinal loops and the dissociation of alkaline sphingomyelinase from the mucosa was assayed. We found that bile salts, including taurocholate, taurodeoxycholate, glycocholate, glycochenodeoxycholate, and 3-(3-cholamidopropyl dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulonate (CHAPS), dose dependently dissociated alkaline sphingomyelinase from the intestinal mucosa. UDC alone did not dissociate the enzyme but significantly inhibited the dissociation caused by other bile salts and CHAPS. Feeding rats with 0.3% (w/w) taurocholate for four days decreased peak activity of intestinal alkaline sphingomyelinase by 39% and total activity in the intestine by 20% and increased the output of the enzyme in the feces. In contrast, feeding 0.3% (w/w) UDC for four days increased the peak activity of alkaline sphingomyelinase in the small intestine by 87% and the activity in the colon by 187%. The total activity of alkaline sphingomyelinase was increased by 80% and the output of the enzyme in the feces was only slightly increased by UDC administration. The changes in alkaline phosphatase after feeding taurocholate and UDC were much smaller. Our results indicate that UDC and other bile salts have different effects on the levels of alkaline sphingomyelinase, which may be implicated in their different influences on cancer development reported previously.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBile Acids and SaltsCholic AcidsColonic NeoplasmsGlycochenodeoxycholic AcidGlycocholic AcidIntestinal MucosaRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySphingomyelin PhosphodiesteraseTaurocholic AcidTaurodeoxycholic AcidUrsodeoxycholic Acid3-((3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonium)-1-propanesulfonateBile Acids and SaltsCholic AcidsGlycochenodeoxycholic AcidGlycocholic AcidSphingomyelin PhosphodiesteraseTaurocholic AcidTaurodeoxycholic AcidUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID9508530
OpenAlexW1980282450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.