ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1998
Insulin lispro (Humalog), the first marketed insulin analogue: indications, contraindications and need for further study.
Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insights into clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence challenges.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Are apolipoprotein E fragments a promising new therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease?Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022Review
- Apolipoprotein and LRP1-Based Peptides as New Therapeutic Tools in Atherosclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- The Potential Therapeutic Application of Peptides and Peptidomimetics in Cardiovascular Disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016Review
- Insulin analogues and management of diabetes mellitus.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review the available literature on the new insulin analogue insulin lispro and provide information on its efficacy, indications for use and contraindications. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches were made for articles published from 1966 to 1996 using the indexing term "lispro", "Humalog" and "insulin analogs". STUDY SELECTION: About 30 studies and review articles were selected based on their relevance to the stated objective. These were critically appraised for the purpose of writing the review article so that it would be relevant to general practitioners, internists and nurse educators. DATA SYNTHESIS: The therapeutic challenge when treating diabetic patients is to bring the blood glucose level into as normal a range as possible, with minimal hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. Insulin lispro has a much faster, higher and shorter-lasting peak serum insulin level than regular human insulin, thus mimicking physiologic secretion of insulin more closely. As a result, there is improvement in postprandial blood glucose levels and decreased episodes of hypoglycemia, with no change in the hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) level. The ability to inject insulin lispro immediately before the meal allows greater flexibility of lifestyle. Compared with regular insulin, insulin lispro is associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia with exercise several hours after a meal. It is therefore most useful for the motivated, compliant diabetic patient who would like to achieve a better hypoglycemia-HgbA1c ratio as well as for patients desiring further flexibility with premeal insulin injections. Use of insulin lispro has been shown to improve HgbA1c levels in patients using insulin pumps. It is well tolerated, and therapy is often continued after studies are completed. Further study is needed to establish optimal basal regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9627564PMC1228925W1872986671What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.