ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)1999
In vitro validation of the luminal measurement of a novel catheter based moulding technique.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate a modified angioplasty balloon catheter, which uses a novel balloon polymer to produce luminal moulds.
designThe catheter was tested in polyurethane phantoms of diameter 1.5 to 4.0 mm. Inflations were to 1.4 atmospheres for 20 seconds at 37 degrees C. The moulds were viewed by reinflating the balloon to 0. 34 atmospheres and quantified using macrophotography and caliper measurement.
resultsEvidence of systematic error was found with lumen diameters </= 2.0 mm, accuracy being 0.32 to 0.80 mm and precision 0.23 to 0.24 mm. However, between 2.5 and 4.0 mm the accuracy of measuring luminal diameters was 0.01 mm, the precision 0. 06 mm, and the absolute mean error 0.05 mm. The results for percentage diameter stenosis were -1.15%, 0.86%, and 1.21%, and for lesion length they were 0.20, 0.60, and 0.41 mm, respectively.
conclusionsThe prototype catheter shows a high degree of accuracy and precision in phantoms of diameter 2.5 to 4.0 mm-the range within which most interventional work is performed. Further work on this technique as a method of direct three dimensional moulding of the coronary artery lumen is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.