Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2004
Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,231 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomised Study to Evaluate the Effects of Different Doses of Statin Treatment on Plaque Volume and Composition in Coronary Disease Determined by Virtual Histology Using Intravascular Ultrasound
Role of Innate and Adaptive Immunity After Acute Myocardial Infarction BATTLE-AMI Study (B And T Types of Lymphocytes Evaluation in Acute Myocardial Infarction)
Estudio clínico Fase III Para Evaluar la Eficacia terapéutica en Pacientes Mexicanos Con Dislipidemia Mediante el Uso vía Oral de L-Carnitina + Atorvastatina Comparado Con Atorvastatina
Comparison of High and Moderate Intensity Statins in Achieving the Target LDL-C Level After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial
Open the trial in the graphThe Effect of Fenofibrate on Endothelial Function and HDL in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and LDL-C at Goal
French Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome With or Without ST Elevation
Evaluation of Oral Alpha-Cyclodextrin for Decreasing Serum Cholesterol
Polypill Strategy for Evidence-Based Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Underserved Patient Population
The Effect of Early Administration of PCSK9 Inhibitor, Alirocumab to Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Associated With Atherosclerosis on the Stroke Prognosis and Lipid Profile, a Single Center Study, Registry Based, Pragmatic, Prospective Trial
INtensive Cholesterol-Lowering With recatIcimab combiNation in Emergency PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1,231 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4,914 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of adverse effects attributed to statin therapy in product labels: a meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Time Gained to Cardiovascular Disease by Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy: Results of Individual Placebo-Controlled Trials and Pooled Effects.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Pooled it
- Preoperative statin therapy for adults undergoing cardiac surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2024 · on this mapPooled it
- Evaluating Readability, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Printable Patient Education Materials for Cholesterol Management: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024 · on this mapPooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials: Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of vascular screening interventions on perceived threat, efficacy beliefs and behavioural intentions: a systematic narrative review.Health promotion international · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety among high-intensity statins. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Pooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Trials Are Not Representative of Patients Managed in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Exclusion Criteria.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Effect and Safety of Ezetimibe and Atorvastatin 5 mg in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Multicenter, Phase 3 Clinical Trial.Clinical cardiology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the randomised LODESTAR trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Trial
- PCSK9 inhibitor treatment and outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but without prior ischaemic events: an observational study.European heart journal · 2026Observational
- The Statin Floor Effect: a Mechanistic Framework for Residual Cardiovascular Risk.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Pre-admission statins and circulatory collapse at hospital arrival in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Open heart · 2026Article
- Secular Trends in Lipid Management Among U.S. Veterans With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, 2003 to 2020.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in older adults: echocardiographic characterization and outcomes in contemporary practice : STEMI in older patients.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Emergency department initiation of guideline-directed cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: an under-recognized opportunity.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Impact of High-Intensity Statins and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol on the Outcomes of Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Syndrome in Japan.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
1,171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLipid-lowering therapy with statins reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, but the optimal level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is unclear.
methodsWe enrolled 4162 patients who had been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome within the preceding 10 days and compared 40 mg of pravastatin daily (standard therapy) with 80 mg of atorvastatin daily (intensive therapy). The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, documented unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, revascularization (performed at least 30 days after randomization), and stroke. The study was designed to establish the noninferiority of pravastatin as compared with atorvastatin with respect to the time to an end-point event. Follow-up lasted 18 to 36 months (mean, 24).
resultsThe median LDL cholesterol level achieved during treatment was 95 mg per deciliter (2.46 mmol per liter) in the standard-dose pravastatin group and 62 mg per deciliter (1.60 mmol per liter) in the high-dose atorvastatin group (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the rates of the primary end point at two years were 26.3 percent in the pravastatin group and 22.4 percent in the atorvastatin group, reflecting a 16 percent reduction in the hazard ratio in favor of atorvastatin (P=0.005; 95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 26 percent). The study did not meet the prespecified criterion for equivalence but did identify the superiority of the more intensive regimen.
conclusionsAmong patients who have recently had an acute coronary syndrome, an intensive lipid-lowering statin regimen provides greater protection against death or major cardiovascular events than does a standard regimen. These findings indicate that such patients benefit from early and continued lowering of LDL cholesterol to levels substantially below current target levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.