Trial reportCurrent atherosclerosis reports2006
The CARDS trial: diabetic patients dealt a winning hand.
Trial report in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013 · on this mapPooled it
- Greater efficacy of atorvastatin versus a non-statin lipid-lowering agent against renal injury: potential role as a histone deacetylase inhibitor.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- CYP3A5 genotyping for assessing the efficacy of treatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin.Genetics and molecular biology · 2015Article
- Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin: comparative effects on glucose metabolism in non-diabetic patients with dyslipidaemia.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until recently, the role of statin therapy in diabetic patients without clinical signs or symptoms of coronary heart disease had been inadequately defined. The Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial designed to compare the effects of atorvastatin with placebo in preventing primary coronary events in diabetic patients. After a median of only 3.9 years (the study was terminated approximately 2 years early due to the magnitude of benefit attributable to atorvastatin therapy), risk for major cardiovascular events was decreased by 37%, acute coronary heart disease-related events were also reduced by 36%, coronary revascularizations by 31%, and stroke by 48%. Benefit emerged within 1 year of initiating therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.