Evidence mapPaperPMID 2215615Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine1990

Regression of coronary artery disease as a result of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in men with high levels of apolipoprotein B.

G Brown, J J Albers, L D Fisher, S M Schaefer, J T Lin, C Kaplan, X Q Zhao, B D Bisson, V F Fitzpatrick, H T Dodge

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000512. Cited by 285 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
285citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
194.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000512 phase3completed

Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study

Ran1984Enrolled146Registered outcomes1Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Coronary Disease, Heart DiseasesArmscolestipol, lovastatin, niacin, Placebo for colestipol, Placebo for lovastatin
Open the trial in the graph
NCT00397657 phase4terminatedstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

ARBITER 6: ARterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6 - HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis (HALTS)

Ran2006Enrolled400Registered outcomes5Posted comparisons0ConditionsAtherosclerosisArmsExtended release niacin, Ezetimibe
Open the trial in the graph
NCT01200056 phase4completedstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomised Study to Evaluate the Effects of Different Doses of Statin Treatment on Plaque Volume and Composition in Coronary Disease Determined by Virtual Histology Using Intravascular Ultrasound

Ran2007Enrolled40Registered outcomes2Posted comparisons0ConditionsCoronary Disease, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Ultrasonography, InterventionalArmsAtorvastatin 10mg versus 40mg.
Open the trial in the graph
NCT01152073 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Study Of Nutraceutical Drinks For Cholesterol (Evaluating Effectiveness and Tolerability)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthy Drink Discoveries, Inc.Ran2009 to 2010Enrolled79ConditionsHyperlipidemiaArmsPlacebo, Second Formulation, Third Formulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

285 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Niacin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017 · on this map
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Recommendations for the management and treatment of dyslipidemia. Report of the Working Group on Hypercholesterolemia and Other Dyslipidemias.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2000
    Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Exchanging carbohydrate or protein for fat improves lipid-related cardiovascular risk profile in overweight men and women when consumed ad libitum.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2010
    Trial
  20. Trial

225 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G BrownDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
J J Albers
L D Fisher
S M Schaefer
J T Lin
C Kaplan
X Q Zhao
B D Bisson
V F Fitzpatrick
H T Dodge
University of Washington · US

Funding

Serum Amyloid and Inflammation in AtherogenesisP01HL030086 · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · 1985 to 2005
$6.9M
FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LEFT HEARTR01HL019451 · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · 1985 to 1990
NCRR NIH HHS RR-37NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL 30086NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL 19451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

methodsThe effect of intensive lipid-lowering therapy on coronary atherosclerosis among men at high risk for cardiovascular events was assessed by quantitative arteriography. Of 146 men no more than 62 years of age who had apolipoprotein B levels greater than or equal to 125 mg per deciliter, documented coronary artery disease, and a family history of vascular disease, 120 completed the 2 1/2-year double-blind study, which included arteriography at base line and after treatment. Patients were given dietary counseling and were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: lovastatin (20 mg twice a day) and colestipol (10 g three times a day); niacin (1 g four times a day) and colestipol (10 g three times a day); or conventional therapy with placebo (or colestipol if the low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level was elevated).

resultsThe levels of LDL and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol changed only slightly in the conventional-therapy group (mean changes, -7 and +5 percent, respectively), but more substantially among patients treated with lovastatin and colestipol (-46 and +15 percent) or niacin and colestipol (-32 and +43 percent). In the conventional-therapy group, 46 percent of the patients had definite lesion progression (and no regression) in at least one of nine proximal coronary segments; regression was the only change in 11 percent. By comparison, progression (as the only change) was less frequent among patients who received lovastatin and colestipol (21 percent) and those who received niacin and colestipol (25 percent), and regression was more frequent (lovastatin and colestipol, 32 percent; niacin and colestipol, 39 percent; P less than 0.005). Multivariate analysis indicated that a reduction in the level of apolipoprotein B (or LDL cholesterol) and in systolic blood pressure, and an increase in HDL cholesterol correlated independently with regression of coronary lesions. Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization for worsening symptoms) occurred in 10 of 52 patients assigned to conventional therapy, as compared with 3 of 46 assigned to receive lovastatin and colestipol and 2 of 48 assigned to receive niacin and colestipol (relative risk of an event during intensive treatment, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.77).

conclusionsIn men with coronary artery disease who were at high risk for cardiovascular events, intensive lipid-lowering therapy reduced the frequency of progression of coronary lesions, increased the frequency of regression, and reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

AdultApolipoproteins BCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLColestipolCoronary AngiographyCoronary DiseaseDietDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLovastatinMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNiacinApolipoproteins BCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLColestipolLovastatinNiacin

Identifiers

PMID2215615
OpenAlexW2324712847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.