Evidence mapPaperPMID 25323312Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2015

Is insulin the most effective injectable antihyperglycaemic therapy?

J B Buse, A Peters, D Russell-Jones, S Furber, M Donsmark, J Han, L MacConell, D Maggs, M Diamant

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00331851. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00331851 phase3completed

Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-5): Effect on Glycaemic Control After Once Daily Administration of Liraglutide in Combination With Glimepiride and Metformin Versus Glimepiride and Metformin Combination Therapy, and Versus Insulin Glargine Added to Glimepiride and Metformin Combination Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.A Six-month Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multi-centre, Multi-national Trial With an Open-label Treat-to-target Insulin Glargine Control Arm.

Ran2006Enrolled584Registered outcomes5Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsGlimepiride, Insulin glargine, liraglutide, Metformin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Random Blood Glucose: Episode 2.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Barriers and facilitators to insulin treatment: a phenomenological inquiry.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

J B BuseUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Medicine/Endocrinology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
A Peters
D Russell-Jones
S Furber
M Donsmark
J Han
L MacConell
D Maggs
M Diamant
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe recent type 2 diabetes American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) position statement suggested insulin is the most effective glucose-lowering therapy, especially when glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is very high. However, randomized studies comparing glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) exenatide once-weekly [OW; DURATION-3 (Diabetes therapy Utilization: Researching changes in A1c, weight, and other factors Through Intervention with exenatide ONce-Weekly)] and liraglutide once-daily [OD; LEAD-5 (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes)] with insulin glargine documented greater HbA1c reduction with GLP-1RAs, from baseline HbA1c ∼8.3% (67 mmol/mol). This post hoc analysis of DURATION-3 and LEAD-5 examined changes in HbA1c, fasting glucose and weight with exenatide OW or liraglutide and glargine, by baseline HbA1c quartile.

methodsDescriptive statistics were provided for change in HbA1c, fasting glucose, weight, and insulin dose, and subjects (%) achieving HbA1c <7.0%, by baseline HbA1c quartile. Inferential statistical analysis on the effect of baseline HbA1c quartile was performed for change in HbA1c. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used to evaluate similarity in change in HbA1c across HbA1c quartiles.

resultsAt 26 weeks, in both studies, HbA1c reduction, and proportion of subjects reaching HbA1c <7.0%, were similar or numerically greater with the GLP-1RAs than glargine for all baseline HbA1c quartiles. Fasting glucose reduction was similar or numerically greater with glargine. Weight decreased with both GLP-1RAs across all quartiles; subjects taking glargine gained weight, more at higher baseline HbA1c. Adverse events were uncommon although gastrointestinal events occurred more frequently with GLP-1RAs.

conclusionsHbA1c reduction with the GLP-1RAs appears at least equivalent to that with basal insulin, irrespective of baseline HbA1c. This suggests that liraglutide and exenatide OW may be appropriate alternatives to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes, including when baseline HbA1c is very high (≥9.0%).

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBody WeightDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExenatideFastingFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingLiraglutideMaleMetforminMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseExenatideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingLiraglutideMetforminPeptidesVenomsbasal insulinexenatideGLP-1 receptor agonistsHbA1cliraglutide

Identifiers

PMID25323312
OpenAlexW2044374397

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.