Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015

Liraglutide in people treated for type 2 diabetes with multiple daily insulin injections: randomised clinical trial (MDI Liraglutide trial).

Marcus Lind, Irl B Hirsch, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Sofia Dahlqvist, Bo Ahrén, Ole Torffvit, Stig Attvall, Magnus Ekelund, Karin Filipsson, Bengt-Olov Tengmark and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it favours the comparator in 1. It is linked to trial NCT04833413 (Effectiveness of Regimen Switch After Intensive Insulin Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
-15.80 · no effect
Glycemic controlfavours the comparator · against placebo · t2d, obesityfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -12.3-15.8 to -8.80
STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS: Liraglutide was associated with a significant reduction of 16.9 mmol/mol (1.5%) in HbA1c versus 4.6 mmol/mol (0.4%) for placebo, difference -12.3 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval -15.8 to -8.8 mmol/mol; -1.13%, -1.45 to -0.81 mmol/mol).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GLP-1 receptor agonists×glycemic control

ContradictsOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 96 favour the treatment, 17 find no difference, 10 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.91replicated · 68 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.92This paper moves it by −0.01.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
This paper · 2015
Δ -12.3-15.8 to -8.80
NCT017204463,297 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.66-0.80 to -0.52
NCT036893742,274 enrolled · 2018
Δ -0.29-0.38 to -0.20
NCT039879191,879 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.51-0.64 to -0.38
NCT026078651,864 enrolled · 2016
Δ -0.50-0.60 to -0.40
NCT013360231,663 enrolled · 2011
Treatment contrast -0.64-0.75 to -0.53
NCT040178321,441 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.20-0.30 to -0.10
NCT018365231,398 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.20-0.32 to -0.07
NCT019301881,231 enrolled · 2013
Δ -1.06-1.21 to -0.91
NCT007344741,202 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.71-0.87 to -0.55
NCT020581471,170 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.29-0.38 to -0.19
NCT003184611,091 enrolled · 2006
Δ -1.09-1.30 to -0.88
NCT021289321,089 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.81-0.96 to -0.67
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04833413 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Regimen Switch After Intensive Insulin Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled1,000ConditionsInsulinArmsContinuous intensive insulin therapy
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Current and Future Role of Insulin Therapy in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Marcus LindInstitute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Medicine, Uddevalla Hospital, NU Hospital Group, 451 80 Uddevalla, Sweden lind.marcus@telia.com.
Irl B HirschUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, US.
Jaakko TuomilehtoCentre for Vascular Prevention, Danube-University, Krems, Austria; Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; Diabetes Research Group, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sofia DahlqvistDepartment of Medicine, Uddevalla Hospital, NU Hospital Group, 451 80 Uddevalla, Sweden.
Bo AhrénLund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ole TorffvitLund University, Lund, Sweden.
Stig AttvallInstitute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Magnus EkelundLund University, Lund, Sweden.
Karin FilipssonLund University, Lund, Sweden.
Bengt-Olov TengmarkCitydiabetes, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan SjöbergKarolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Halland County Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden.
Nils-Gunnar PehrssonStatistiska Konsultgruppen, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lund University · SENU Hospital Group · SEBarndiabetesfondens · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversität für Weiterbildung Krems · ATUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

study questionWhat are the effects of liraglutide, an incretin based treatment, on glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections?

methodsThe study was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial with a parallel group design carried out at 13 hospital based outpatient clinics and one primary care unit in Sweden. Patients were considered eligible for inclusion if they had type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c concentrations ≥ 58 mmol/mol (7.5%) and ≤ 102 mmol/mol (11.5%)), a body mass index of 27.5-45 kg/m(2), and required multiple daily insulin injections. Overall, 124 participants were randomised 1:1 to subcutaneous liraglutide or placebo by minimisation allocation. The main outcome measure was change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 24. STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS: Liraglutide was associated with a significant reduction of 16.9 mmol/mol (1.5%) in HbA1c versus 4.6 mmol/mol (0.4%) for placebo, difference -12.3 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval -15.8 to -8.8 mmol/mol; -1.13%, -1.45 to -0.81 mmol/mol). Body weight was significantly reduced in participants in the liraglutide compared with placebo group (3.8 v 0.0 kg, difference -3.8, -4.9 to -2.8 kg), and total daily insulin doses were significantly reduced, by 18.1 units and 2.3 units (difference -15.8, -23.1 to -8.5 units). Reductions in mean and standard deviation of glucose levels estimated by masked continuous glucose monitoring were significantly greater in the liraglutide group than placebo group (-1.9 and -0.5 mmol/L). Neither group experienced severe hypoglycaemic events nor were there any significant differences in symptomatic or asymptomatic non-severe hypoglycaemia (<4.0 or <3.0 mmol/L). The mean number of non-severe symptomatic hypoglycaemic events (<4.0 mmol/L) during follow-up was 1.29 in the liraglutide group and 1.24 in the placebo group (P=0.96). One of the study's limitations was its relatively short duration. Sustained effects of liraglutide have, however, been found over lengthier periods in connection with other treatment regimens. Cardiovascular safety and potential adverse events during longer exposure to liraglutide need to be evaluated. Nausea was experienced by 21 (32.8%) participants in the liraglutide group and 5 (7.8%) in the placebo group and 3 (5%) and 4 (7%) participants in these groups, respectively, had any serious adverse event. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Adding liraglutide to multiple daily insulin injections in people with type 2 diabetes improves glycaemic control without an increased risk of hypoglycaemia, reduces body weight, and enables patients to lower their insulin doses. FUNDING, COMPETING INTERESTS, DATA SHARING: This study was an investigator initiated trial, supported in part by Novo Nordisk and InfuCare. Potential competing interests have been reported and are available on the bmj.com. STUDY REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2012-001941-42.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Double-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFastingFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInjections, SubcutaneousInsulinLiraglutideMaleBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinLiraglutide

Identifiers

PMID26512041
PMCPMC4624838
OpenAlexW1824987203

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.