Evidence mapPaperPMID 26895767Full record

SynthesisCardiovascular diabetology2016

Cardiovascular effects of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and different risk categories: a meta-analysis.

Christian Sonesson, Peter A Johansson, Eva Johnsson, Ingrid Gause-Nilsson

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Cardio-Onco-Metabolism - Metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer and the heart.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Beyond the Glycaemic Control of Dapagliflozin: Impact on Arterial Stiffness and Macroangiopathy.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian SonessonAstraZeneca Gothenburg, Pepparedsleden 1, SE-431 83, Mölndal, Sweden. Christian.Sonesson@astrazeneca.com.
Peter A JohanssonAstraZeneca Gothenburg, Pepparedsleden 1, SE-431 83, Mölndal, Sweden. Peter.A.Johansson@astrazeneca.com.
Eva JohnssonAstraZeneca Gothenburg, Pepparedsleden 1, SE-431 83, Mölndal, Sweden. Eva.Johnsson@astrazeneca.com.
Ingrid Gause-NilssonAstraZeneca Gothenburg, Pepparedsleden 1, SE-431 83, Mölndal, Sweden. Ingrid.Gause-Nilsson@astrazeneca.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA pre-specified meta-analysis of cardiovascular (CV) events from 21 phase 2b/3 dapagliflozin clinical trials was undertaken to characterise the CV profile of dapagliflozin. This showed no increase in CV risk with dapagliflozin compared with control (placebo or comparator treatment) with or without background glucose-lowering therapies. The analysis reported here aimed to characterise the CV profile of dapagliflozin in subgroups of patients in these 21 studies grouped by degree of CV risk, based on both baseline and in-study risk factors (including hypoglycaemic events), with a focus on major adverse CV events (MACE).

methodsPatients with type 2 diabetes, both overall and with different levels of CV risk, including CV disease (CVD) history, age and other CV risk factors, were analysed. A further analysis compared CV risk in patients who experienced a hypoglycaemic event prior to MACE and those who did not. Analyses were based on time to first event using a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by study comparing dapagliflozin versus control.

resultsIn total, 9339 patients were included in this meta-analysis; 5936 patients received dapagliflozin 2.5-10 mg (6668 patient-years) and 3403 received control (3882 patient-years). Dapagliflozin is not associated with increased CV risk and results further suggest the potential for a beneficial effect both in the overall population [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.77; 95 % CI (0.54, 1.10) for MACE] and in those with a history of CVD [HR 0.80 (0.53, 1.22)]. These findings were consistent in patients with varying degrees of CV risk, including age, number and type of CVD events in medical history and number of CV risk factors present. Furthermore, there was no increased risk of MACE in patients who experienced a hypoglycaemic event compared with those who did not.

conclusionsThere was no suggestion of increased risk for MACE with dapagliflozin compared with control in any of the populations investigated. In addition, the results suggest the potential for a beneficial CV effect which is consistent with the multifactorial benefits on CV risk factors associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

Indexed as

AgedBenzhydryl CompoundsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlucosidesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsBenzhydryl CompoundsBiomarkersBlood GlucosedapagliflozinGlucosidesHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26895767
PMCPMC4761166

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.