SynthesisOncotarget2016

Metformin therapy associated with survival benefit in lung cancer patients with diabetes.

Guoxing Wan, Xiongjie Yu, Ping Chen, Xianhe Wang, Dongfeng Pan, Xuanbin Wang, Linjun Li, Xiaojun Cai, Fengjun Cao

Full text readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports 2 associations that do not count as treatment evidence, such as HR 0.78 (0.64 to 0.93) for all-cause mortality. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

2numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

All-cause mortalityan association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.780.64 to 0.93
Overall, the results revealed a significant association of metformin use with a better survival of lung cancer patients with diabetes(for DFS: HR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.52-0.83; for OS: HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64-0.93).
All-cause mortalityan association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.650.52 to 0.83
Overall, the results revealed a significant association of metformin use with a better survival of lung cancer patients with diabetes(for DFS: HR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.52-0.83; for OS: HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64-0.93).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×all-cause mortality

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50one trial · 1 family supports, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT000387272,779 enrolled · 1996
HR 0.990.79 to 1.25

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metformin - a new approach.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. A Cohort Study of Exposure to Antihyperglycemic Therapy and Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. PYK2 promotes HER2-positive breast cancer invasion.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guoxing WanDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Xiongjie YuDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Ping ChenDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Xianhe WangDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Dongfeng PanDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Xuanbin WangDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Linjun LiDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Xiaojun CaiDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Fengjun CaoDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

The purpose of this study is to summarize the currently available evidence regarding the concerned issue by performing a comprehensive meta-analysis. Relevant publications reporting the association of metformin use with survival of lung cancer patients with diabetes were electronically searched to identify eligible studies. The meta-analysis was performed with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) as effect measures for disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS) estimates. A total of 17 individual studies from 10 publications were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the results revealed a significant association of metformin use with a better survival of lung cancer patients with diabetes(for DFS: HR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.52-0.83; for OS: HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64-0.93). The subgroup analyses showed similar association in Asian region(for DFS:HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.59-0.80; for OS: HR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.46-0.67) but not in Western region. Such association was also presented in small cell lung cancer (for DFS: HR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.38-0.77; for OS: HR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.39-0.69) and in non-small cell lung cancer(for DFS: HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.51-0.96; for OS: HR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.58- 0.97). Analyses stratified by treatment strategy showed a reduction in the risk of cancer-related mortality in patients receiving chemotherapy(for DFS: HR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.64-0.83; for OS: HR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.47-0.71) but not in patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. The meta-analysis demonstrated that metformin use was significantly associated with a favorable survival outcome of lung cancer patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLung NeoplasmsMetforminHypoglycemic AgentsMetformindiabeteslung cancermeta-analysismetforminsurvival

Identifiers

PMID27105507
PMCPMC5085241

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.