Trial reportJAMA cardiology2016

Association of Lipoproteins, Insulin Resistance, and Rosuvastatin With Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus : Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sagar B Dugani, Akintunde O Akinkuolie, Nina Paynter, Robert J Glynn, Paul M Ridker, Samia Mora

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2016. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it supports the treatment in 1. It is linked to trial NCT00239681 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of Rosuvastatin), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers.

2numbers the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
21 · no effect
Blood pressurefavours the treatment · against placebo · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 1.351.03 to 1.76
After additional adjustment for systolic blood pressure, body mass index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hemoglobin A1c, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, the LPIR score remained associated with T2DM in the placebo arm (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03-1.76) and rosuvastatin arm (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.27-2.03).
Blood pressurefavours the treatment · against placebo · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 1.601.27 to 2.03
After additional adjustment for systolic blood pressure, body mass index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hemoglobin A1c, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, the LPIR score remained associated with T2DM in the placebo arm (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03-1.76) and rosuvastatin arm (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.27-2.03).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×blood pressure

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

9 readable studies in this cell: 4 favour the treatment, 4 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.83replicated · 5 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.80This paper moves it by +0.03.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2016
HR 1.351.03 to 1.76
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 3.000.32 to 77.2
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00239681 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of Rosuvastatin (CRESTOR®) 20 mg in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events Among Subjects With Low Levels of Low Density Lipoprotein(LDL) Cholesterol & Elevated Levels of C-Reactive Protein

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2003 to 2008Enrolled17,802ConditionsElevated High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)ArmsRosuvastatin, Placebo
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sagar B DuganiDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts2Division of Internal Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Akintunde O AkinkuolieDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nina PaynterDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert J GlynnDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts4Department of Biostatistics, Brigham and Women's Hospita.
Paul M RidkerDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts5Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Samia MoraDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts5Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

Training Program in the Epidemiology of CVDT32HL007575 · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · 1985 to 2005
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117861NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007575
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

importanceStatins decrease levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglycerides as well as cardiovascular events but increase the risk for a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The risk factors associated with incident T2DM are incompletely characterized.

objectiveTo investigate the association of lipoprotein subclasses and size and a novel lipoprotein insulin resistance (LPIR) score (a composite of 6 lipoprotein measures) with incident T2DM among individuals randomized to a high-intensity statin or placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis secondary analysis of the JUPITER trial (a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial) was conducted at 1315 sites in 26 countries and enrolled 17 802 men 50 years or older and women 60 years or older with LDL cholesterol levels less than 130 mg/dL, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of at least 2 mg/L, and triglyceride levels less than 500 mg/dL. Those with T2DM were excluded. A prespecified secondary aim was to assess the effect of rosuvastatin calcium on T2DM. Incident T2DM was monitored for a median of 2.0 years. Data were collected from February 4, 2003, to August 20, 2008, and analyzed (intention-to-treat) from December 1, 2013, to January 21, 2016.

interventionsRosuvastatin calcium, 20 mg/d, or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Size and concentration of lipids, apolipoproteins, and lipoproteins at baseline (11 918 patients with evaluable plasma samples) and 12 months after randomization (9180 patients). The LPIR score, a correlate of insulin resistance, was calculated as a weighted combination of size and concentrations of LDL, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles.

resultsAmong the 11 918 patients (4334 women [36.4%]; median [interquartile range] age, 66 [60-71] years), rosuvastatin lowered the levels of LDL particles (-39.6%; 95% CI, -49.4% to -24.6%), VLDL particles (-19.6%; 95% CI, -40.6% to 10.3%), and VLDL triglycerides (-15.2%; 95% CI, -35.9% to 11.3%) and shifted the lipoprotein subclass distribution toward smaller LDL size (-1.5%; 95% CI, -3.7% to 0.5%), larger VLDL size (2.8%; 95% CI, -5.8% to 12.7%), and lower LPIR score (-3.2%; 95% CI, -20.6% to 16.9%). In analyses adjusted for age, sex, race or ethnic origin, exercise, educational level, family history, and smoking, the hazard ratio (HR) for T2DM per SD of LPIR score in the placebo arm was 1.99 (95% CI, 1.64-2.42); in the rosuvastatin arm, 2.06 (95% CI, 1.74-2.43). After additional adjustment for systolic blood pressure, body mass index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hemoglobin A1c, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, the LPIR score remained associated with T2DM in the placebo arm (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03-1.76) and rosuvastatin arm (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.27-2.03). Similar trends were seen at 12 months. The LPIR score improved the model likelihood ratio (χ2 = 18.23; P < .001) and categorical net reclassification index (0.039; 95% CI, 0.003-0.072). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In apparently healthy people, LPIR score was positively associated with incident T2DM, including during rosuvastatin therapy.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00239681.

Indexed as

AgedCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsInsulin ResistanceLipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLLipoproteins, VLDLMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk FactorsCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLLipoproteins, VLDLRosuvastatin CalciumTriglyceridesvery low density lipoprotein triglyceride

Identifiers

PMID27347563
PMCPMC4918085
OpenAlexW2342166197

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.