Evidence mapPaperPMID 28833481Full record

Trial reportDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2017

Exploring residual risk for diabetes and microvascular disease in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS).

L Perreault, Q Pan, V R Aroda, E Barrett-Connor, D Dabelea, S Dagogo-Jack, R F Hamman, S E Kahn, K J Mather, W C Knowler and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

L PerreaultUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Q PanGeorge Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA.
V R ArodaMedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
E Barrett-ConnorUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
D DabeleaColorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
S Dagogo-JackUniversity of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA.
R F HammanColorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
S E KahnVA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
K J MatherIndiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
W C KnowlerNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research GroupORCID 0000-0002-7674-5071
Colorado School of Public Health · USGeorge Washington University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMedStar Health · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIAL--DATA COORDINATING CENTERU01DK048489 · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 1994 to 2005
$23.7M
Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · 1986 to 2025
$12.6M
Post-DDP Follow-up StudyU01DK048413 · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · 1994 to 2005
$4.4M
PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIALU01DK048443 · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · 1994 to 2005
$4.0M
PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIAL (DPT-2)U01DK048397 · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · 1994 to 2005
$3.8M
Post-DPP Follow-up StudyU01DK048485 · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · 1994 to 2005
$3.7M
NIDDM PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIALU01DK048412 · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 1994 to 2005
$3.6M
PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIAL (DPT-2)U01DK048339 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · 1994 to 2005
$3.6M
Post-DPP Follow-Up StudyU01DK048400 · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 1994 to 2005
$3.6M
Post-DPP Follow-up StudyU01DK048437 · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · 1994 to 2005
$3.5M
NIDDM PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIAL (DPT 2)U01DK048404 · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · 1994 to 2005
$3.5M
Post-DPP Follow-up StudyU01DK048375 · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · 1994 to 2005
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK097512NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048339NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048375NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048381NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048400NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048404NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048406NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048407NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048412NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048413NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048437NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048443NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048485NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048489NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimApproximately half of the participants in the Diabetes Prevention Outcomes Study (DPPOS) had diabetes after 15 years of follow-up, whereas nearly all the others remained with pre-diabetes. We examined whether formerly unexplored factors in the DPPOS coexisted with known risk factors that posed additional risk for, or protection from, diabetes as well as microvascular disease.

methodsCox proportional hazard models were used to examine predictors of diabetes. Sequential modelling procedures considered known and formerly unexplored factors. We also constructed models to determine whether the same unexplored factors that associated with progression to diabetes also predicted the prevalence of microvascular disease. Hazard ratios (HR) are per standard deviation change in the variable.

resultsIn models adjusted for demographics and known diabetes risk factors, two formerly unknown factors were associated with risk for both diabetes and microvascular disease: number of medications taken (HR = 1.07, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 1.03 to 1.12 for diabetes; odds ratio (OR) = 1.10, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.16 for microvascular disease) and variability in HbA

conclusionsSeveral formerly unexplored factors in the DPPOS predicted additional risk for diabetes and/or microvascular disease - particularly hypertension and the use of anti-hypertensive medications - helping to explain some of the residual disease risk in participants of the DPPOS.

Indexed as

Weight Reduction ProgramsAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesDiet, ReducingExercise TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMetforminMiddle AgedObesityOverweightPrediabetic StatePrevalenceMetformin

Identifiers

PMID28833481
PMCPMC5687994
OpenAlexW2750051511

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.