Who was studied, and how
Six numbers in the abstract
Where each one falls
Where it lands on the map
What it changes
Among 23 other studies
The trial randomly assignedassigned by chance
Probably lowered HbA1c reduction from baseline to week 30−1.35
Probably lowered body weight decrease from baseline to end of treatment−2.31
No clear effect on severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemic episodes2.1×
randomisedThe trial randomly assignedassigned by chance
Probably lowered HbA1c reduction from baseline to week 30−1.75
Probably lowered body weight decrease from baseline to end of treatment−5.06
No clear effect on severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemic episodes2.4×
randomisedthe abstract, start to end
… treatment difference (ETD) vs placebo, -1.35 (14.8 mmol/mol); 95% CI, -1.61 to -1.10 and ETD, -1.75% (19.2 mmol/mol); 95% CI, -2.01 …
… (estimated rate ratio vs placebo, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.67 to 6.51 and estimated rate ratio vs placebo, 2.41; 95% CI, 0.84 to 6.96 for 0.5 …
… of treatment: 3.7, 6.4, and 1.4 kg (ETD, -2.31; 95% CI, -3.33 to -1.29 and ETD, -5.06; 95% CI, -6.08 to -4.04 kg; …
GLP-1 receptor agonists × glycemic controlhelps?replicated
GLP-1 receptor agonists × body weight & compositionhelps?replicated
GLP-1 receptor agonists × hypoglycaemiaharms?mixed