SynthesisMedicine2018
Association of metformin intake with bladder cancer risk and oncologic outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph read 12 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports 5 associations that do not count as treatment evidence, such as HR 0.70 (0.51 to 0.96) for adverse events & safety. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
A meta-analysis revealed that metformin intake was associated with an increased recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-0.88; P = .01; I = 64%), improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.96; P = .03; I = 33%), and prolonged cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40-0.81; P = .002; I = 0%).
A meta-analysis revealed that metformin intake was associated with an increased recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-0.88; P = .01; I = 64%), improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.96; P = .03; I = 33%), and prolonged cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40-0.81; P = .002; I = 0%).
However, results demonstrated that metformin intake was not associated with a decreased incidence of bladder cancer (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.61-1.09; P = .17; I = 85%) or an increased overall survival in bladder cancer patients (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.47-1.44; P = .50; I = 64%).
However, results demonstrated that metformin intake was not associated with a decreased incidence of bladder cancer (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.61-1.09; P = .17; I = 85%) or an increased overall survival in bladder cancer patients (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.47-1.44; P = .50; I = 64%).
Overall, metformin use was not associated with a decreased incidence of bladder cancer (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.61-1.09; P = .17).
A subgroup analysis by different ethnicities demonstrated that metformin intake had a significant association with bladder cancer among Asian patients (HR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.48-0.81; P < .01).
A meta-analysis revealed that metformin intake was associated with an increased recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-0.88; P = .01; I = 64%), improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.96; P = .03; I = 33%), and prolonged cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40-0.81; P = .002; I = 0%).
Overall, metformin intake was associated with an increased RFS of bladder cancer (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.35-0.88; P = .01).
Subgroup analysis by different tumor stage demonstrated that metformin use had an increased RFS for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) (HR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.30-0.71; P < .01), whereas such an association was not observed for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.27-1.54; P = .33) (Fig. 3A).
Overall, metformin intake was associated with an increased CSS of bladder cancer (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40-0.81; P = .002) (Fig. 4B).
Overall, no significant association was observed between metformin use and OS of bladder cancer (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.47-1.44; P = .50) (Fig. 4A).
Overall, metformin intake was associated with an increased PFS of bladder cancer (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.96; P = .03) (Fig. 3C).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Metformin×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Metformin×adverse events & safety
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →22 readable studies in this cell: 9 favour the treatment, 8 find no difference, 5 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association Between Metformin Use and Risk of Lung Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026 · on this mapPooled it
- Impact of metformin on melanoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022Guideline
- The Effect of Metformin on Bladder Cancer Incidence and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Pooled it
- Metformin Use on Incidence and Oncologic Outcomes of Bladder Cancer Patients With T2DM: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Diabetes on the Prognosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- The Potential Effect of Metformin on Cancer: An Umbrella Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of Metformin Versus Placebo on New Primary Cancers in Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.32: A Secondary Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Double-Blind Trial in Early Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Beyond diabetes mellitus: role of metformin in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Singapore medical journal · 2022Trial
- Impact of metformin use on the outcomes of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2019Trial
- The Insulin-Urothelial Axis: Evaluating Insulin Resistance as a Convergent Driver of Bladder Cancer Across Diverse Risk Factor Profiles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- The interplay of dietary sugar, chronic inflammation, and bladder cancer: mechanistic insights, evidence, and prevention strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Metformin as an anti-cancer agent against bladder cancer acts via PD-L1 downregulation in an orthotopic mouse model.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Lithuania.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Prediction of recurrence risk in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Asian journal of urology · 2024Article
- Metformin: Beyond Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
- Editorial: Recent advances in the treatment of upper urinary tract bladder cancers.Frontiers in urology · 2023Article
- Clinical features and predictive biomarkers for bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes presenting with haematuria.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundRecent clinical trials indicated that metformin intake might play a protective role in the incidence and oncologic outcomes of various cancers. However, its protective effect on bladder cancer remains uncertain.
methodsWe performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between metformin intake and bladder cancer risk as well as oncologic outcomes in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Search Library in December 2017. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was pooled.
resultsA total of 9 retrospective cohort studies with 1,270,179 patients were included. A meta-analysis revealed that metformin intake was associated with an increased recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-0.88; P = .01; I = 64%), improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.96; P = .03; I = 33%), and prolonged cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40-0.81; P = .002; I = 0%). However, results demonstrated that metformin intake was not associated with a decreased incidence of bladder cancer (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.61-1.09; P = .17; I = 85%) or an increased overall survival in bladder cancer patients (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.47-1.44; P = .50; I = 64%).
conclusionThe present meta-analysis indicated that metformin intake could improve the prognosis of bladder cancer patients. Further prospective cohort studies and mechanistic studies are still required to determine the precise role of metformin in the initiation and progression of bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.