Evidence mapPaperPMID 30535837Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2019

Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Daily Liraglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Estonia.

Samuel J P Malkin, Monika Russel-Szymczyk, Girtel Liidemann, Vallo Volke, Barnaby Hunt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01885208. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01885208 phase3completed

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Exenatide ER 2.0 mg Once-weekly as add-on to 1-2 Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN™ 3 - vs. QW GLP-1)

Ran2013Enrolled813Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons2ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Armsexenatide, semaglutide
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Framework for developing cost-effectiveness analysis threshold: the case of Egypt.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg Versus Liraglutide 1.8 mg: A Health Economic Analysis in the UK.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel J P MalkinOssian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland.
Monika Russel-SzymczykNovo Nordisk Pharma Sp. z o.o, Warsaw, Poland.
Girtel LiidemannNovo Nordisk A/S Eesti Filiaal, Tallinn, Estonia.
Vallo VolkeDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Barnaby HuntOssian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland. hunt@ossianconsulting.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-279X
Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft · CHTartu University Hospital · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOnce-weekly semaglutide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes that was associated with greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) versus once-daily GLP-1 analogue liraglutide in a recent network meta-analysis (NMA). The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus liraglutide 1.2 mg in Estonia.

methodsOutcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model (version 9.0), with baseline cohort characteristics sourced from SUSTAIN 3 and changes in HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and BMI associated with once-weekly semaglutide and liraglutide derived from the NMA. Patients were assumed to receive once-weekly semaglutide or liraglutide for 5 years before intensifying to basal insulin. Treatment effects were applied for the first 5 years, after which HbA1c increased to 7.0%, SBP followed a natural progression, and BMI reverted to baseline for the remainder of the analysis. Costs were expressed in euros (EUR) and estimated from a healthcare payer perspective. Utilities associated with diabetes and diabetes-related complications were taken from published sources.

resultsOnce-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.13 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus liraglutide 1.2 mg. Direct costs were EUR 67 higher with once-weekly semaglutide, due to the increased acquisition cost, but this was mostly offset by cost savings due to avoidance of diabetes-related complications. Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was therefore associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 523 per QALY gained versus liraglutide 1.2 mg, which falls well below a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 52,390 per QALY gained (three times the Estonian GDP per capita).

conclusionOnce-weekly semaglutide was considered highly cost-effective versus liraglutide 1.2 mg for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in Estonia.

fundingNovo Nordisk A/S. Plain language summary available for this article.

Indexed as

CostCost-effectivenessDiabetes mellitusEstoniaGLP-1 analogueGLP-1 receptor agonistLiraglutideSemaglutide

Identifiers

PMID30535837
PMCPMC6349296
OpenAlexW2904771920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.