Evidence mapPaperPMID 31758520Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2020

Once-Weekly Dulaglutide with Insulin Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Efficacy and Safety Results from a Phase 4, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Hitoshi Ishii, Yukiko Onishi, Tomonori Oura, Masakazu Takeuchi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT02750410. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02750410 phase4completed

A Phase 4 Study of Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide When Added to Insulin Treatment With or Without Oral Antidiabetic Medication in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Ran2016Enrolled159Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons11ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsDulaglutide, Placebo
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Using Insulin: Exploratory Subgroup Analysis by Insulin Regimen.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hitoshi IshiiDepartment of Diabetology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yukiko OnishiThe Institute for Adult Diseases, Asahi Life Foundation, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomonori OuraEli Lilly Japan K.K., Medical Development Unit-Japan, Kobe, Japan.
Masakazu TakeuchiEli Lilly Japan K.K., Medical Development Unit-Japan, Kobe, Japan. takeuchi_masakazu@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-3118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough global studies have investigated the combination of dulaglutide with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), differences in lean body mass and dulaglutide dosing can complicate the extrapolation of global study results to Japanese patients. This phase 4, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and subsequent open-label study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg in combination with insulin therapy in patients with T2DM.

methodsPatients enrolled in this multicenter study were Japanese with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c 7.5-10.5%) with insulin therapy (basal insulin, premixed insulin, or basal/mealtime insulin) in combination with or without one or two oral antidiabetic agents (OADs). Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to dulaglutide or placebo. The first 16 weeks was the double-blind period with stable insulin dosing, and patients taking placebo were switched to dulaglutide for an additional 36-week open-label period in which all patients took dulaglutide (52 weeks total).

resultsPatients (N = 159) were randomized to dulaglutide (n = 120) or placebo (n = 39). The least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline in HbA1c at week 16 were dulaglutide - 1.45% and placebo 0.06%. The LS mean and 95% confidence interval for the difference were - 1.50% (- 1.73%, - 1.28%) and dulaglutide was superior to placebo. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in changes from baseline in body weight and insulin dose. The most frequently observed treatment-emergent adverse events in dulaglutide were nasopharyngitis, constipation, abdominal discomfort, nausea, and decreased appetite. The incidence rates of hypoglycemic events by week 16 were dulaglutide 42.5% and placebo 30.8% (P = 0.258).

conclusionOnce-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg was superior to once-weekly placebo in glycemic control improvement and well tolerated in patients with T2DM in combination with insulin therapy with or without OADs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02750410.

fundingEli Lilly and Company.

Indexed as

DulaglutideGLP-1 analogInsulin therapyPhase IV studyType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID31758520
PMCPMC6965529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.