Evidence mapPaperPMID 32006052Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

The neuroscience of sugars in taste, gut-reward, feeding circuits, and obesity.

Ranier Gutierrez, Esmeralda Fonseca, Sidney A Simon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. GABAMedComm · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Protein Extract of a Probiotic Strain ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The neural basis of sugar preference.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ranier GutierrezLaboratory of Neurobiology of Appetite, Department of Pharmacology, CINVESTAV, 07360, Mexico City, Mexico. ranier@cinvestav.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9688-0289
Esmeralda FonsecaLaboratory of Neurobiology of Appetite, Department of Pharmacology, CINVESTAV, 07360, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sidney A SimonDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXDuke University · US

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Fronteras de la Ciencia 63Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Problemas Nacionales 464Productos Medix Productos Medix 3247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout the animal kingdom sucrose is one of the most palatable and preferred tastants. From an evolutionary perspective, this is not surprising as it is a primary source of energy. However, its overconsumption can result in obesity and an associated cornucopia of maladies, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Here we describe three physiological levels of processing sucrose that are involved in the decision to ingest it: the tongue, gut, and brain. The first section describes the peripheral cellular and molecular mechanisms of sweet taste identification that project to higher brain centers. We argue that stimulation of the tongue with sucrose triggers the formation of three distinct pathways that convey sensory attributes about its quality, palatability, and intensity that results in a perception of sweet taste. We also discuss the coding of sucrose throughout the gustatory pathway. The second section reviews how sucrose, and other palatable foods, interact with the gut-brain axis either through the hepatoportal system and/or vagal pathways in a manner that encodes both the rewarding and of nutritional value of foods. The third section reviews the homeostatic, hedonic, and aversive brain circuits involved in the control of food intake. Finally, we discuss evidence that overconsumption of sugars (or high fat diets) blunts taste perception, the post-ingestive nutritional reward value, and the circuits that control feeding in a manner that can lead to the development of obesity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansLeptinNeuronsNutritive ValueObesityReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSugarsTasteLeptinReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSugarsAgRPGut-rewardHedonic taste valueLHA GABA neuronsNutritional valueObesitySugarsSweetness

Identifiers

PMID32006052
PMCPMC11105013
OpenAlexW3003816343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.