Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32110075›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2020

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Low-Dose Statin to High-Intensity Statin for Primary Prevention in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nuntakorn Thongtang, Jirasak Piyapromdee, Natthakan Tangkittikasem, Kittichai Samaithongcharoen, Nithiwat Srikanchanawat, Sutin Sriussadaporn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nuntakorn ThongtangDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8810-5397
Jirasak PiyapromdeeDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthakan TangkittikasemDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kittichai SamaithongcharoenDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nithiwat SrikanchanawatDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sutin SriussadapornDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStatin intensification is required in patients who have high-risk for cardiovascular events. However, it is unclear if this is needed in whom plasma LDL-C target was achieved with low-dose statin for primary prevention. We investigated the efficacy and safety of switching from low-dose statin to high-intensity statin among type 2 diabetes (T2D) who had achieved plasma LDL-C <100 mg/dl with low-dose statin treatment.

methodsT2D patients with no atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who had plasma LDL-C level <100 mg/dl while taking simvastatin ≤20 mg/day were randomized to continue using the same dosage of simvastatin (low-dose statin group; LS) for 12 weeks, or to switch to atorvastatin 40 mg/day for 6 weeks, and then, if tolerated, to atorvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks (high-intensity statin group; HS). Biochemical test and adverse events were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks.

resultsOne hundred and fifty patients (76 LS, 74 HS, mean age 58.9±8.9 years, 72% female) were included. The mean baseline plasma LDL-C level on statin was slightly higher in the HS group (71.9±13.6 vs. 68.1±14.2 mg/dl,

conclusionSwitching from low-dose statins to high-intensity statins resulted in a significant reduction in plasma LDL-C levels, and was fairly well tolerated during a 12-week study period.

Indexed as

efficacyhigh-intensity statinprimary preventionsafetyThai patientstype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32110075
PMCPMC7038773
OpenAlexW3006679742

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.