Evidence mapPaperPMID 33010240Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2020

Dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (ADVANCE): week 96 results from a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Willem D F Venter, Simiso Sokhela, Bryony Simmons, Michelle Moorhouse, Lee Fairlie, Nkuli Mashabane, Celicia Serenata, Godspower Akpomiemie, Masebole Masenya, Ambar Qavi and 11 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 146 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06438146 phase4unknown statusstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Liraglutide for Management of Obesity in People Living With HIV on Dolutegravir-based Antiretroviral Therapy: a Single-arm Acceptability Study in South Africa

Ran2024Enrolled40Registered outcomes30Posted comparisons0ConditionsHIV Infections, ObesityArmsliraglutide
Open the trial in the graph
NCT03122262 phase3completednot on this map

WRHI 060 (ADVANCE): A Randomised, Phase 3 Non-inferiority Study of DTG + TAF + FTC Compared With DTG + TDF + FTC and EFV + TDF + FTC in Patients Infected With HIV-1 Starting First-line Antiretroviral Therapy - Extension to 192 Weeks

TypeinterventionalSponsorProfessor Francois VenterRan2017 to 2022Enrolled1,110ConditionsHIV-1 InfectionArmsDolutegravir, Tenofovir Alafenamide, Truvada, Atripla
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Impact of Integrase Inhibitors on Cardiovascular Disease Events in People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Starting Antiretroviral Therapy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Willem D F VenterEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Electronic address: fventer@ezintsha.org.
Simiso SokhelaEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Bryony SimmonsDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michelle MoorhouseEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lee FairlieWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nkuli MashabaneEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Celicia SerenataEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Godspower AkpomiemieEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Masebole MasenyaWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ambar QaviSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nomathemba ChandiwanaEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kaitlyn McCannSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Shane NorrisSouth African Medical Research Council and Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Matthew ChersichWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Gary MaartensDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Samanta Lalla-EdwardEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Alinda VosEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Polly ClaydenHIV i-Base, London, UK.
Elaine AbramsICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Natasha ArulappanEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Andrew HillDepartment of Translational Medicine, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAImperial College London · GBColumbia University · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundADVANCE compared the efficacy and safety of two antiretroviral first-line combinations (dolutegravir combined with emtricitabine and either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide), with a third regimen (efavirenz combined with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) previously recommended by WHO. Here, we report the 96-week data for the study.

methodsThis randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial, was done at two research sites in Johannesburg, South Africa, after participant recruitment from 11 public health clinics also in Johannesburg. Eligible participants were aged 12 years or older with HIV-1 infection, who weighed at least 40 kg, had no antiretroviral exposure in the previous 6 months, with a creatinine clearance of more than 60 mL/min (>80 mL per min in individuals aged <19 years), and a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of 500 copies per mL or higher. Individuals who were pregnant or had tuberculosis were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by study staff using a computerised randomisation system. Randomisation was stratified by age (12 and <19 years and ≥19 years). Participants were randomly assigned to once-daily oral fixed-dose combination tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg, and once-daily oral dolutegravir 50 mg; once-daily oral fixed-dose combination tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg, and once-daily oral dolutegravir 50 mg; or once-daily oral fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and efavirenz 600 mg. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who had a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, which has been reported previously. Here, we report the key secondary efficacy endpoint of the proportion of participants who had a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL at the week 96 visit, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -10%. Safety data, including clinical, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and laboratory data, are also reported. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03122262.

findingsBetween Jan 17, 2017, and May 14, 2018, we screened 1453 individuals, of whom 1053 were enrolled: 351 participants were randomly assigned to the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, 351 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, and 351 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz group. All participants received at least one dose of study medication and were included in the primary analysis. At week 96, 276 (79%) of 351 participants in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, 275 (78%) of 351 participants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, and 258 (74%) of 351 participants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz group had achieved a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL. Non-inferiority was established in all three comparisons. The proportion of patients with protocol-defined virological failure at week 96 was low in all treatment groups. Participants in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group had fewer changes in bone density than the two other treatment groups. Mean weight gain was substantial (7·1 kg [SD 7·4] in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group; 4·3 kg [6·7] in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir group, and 2·3 kg [7·0] in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz group), and was greater among women than men. Ten (3%) of 351 participants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz group discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events, of which liver dysfunction (n=4) and rash (n=4) were most common.

interpretationMedium-term and long-term metabolic and clinical consequences of the considerable increase in bodyweight observed in participants given these antiretroviral regimens and the trajectory of this weight gain over time, especially among women, require further study.

fundingUSAID, Unitaid, South African Medical Research Council, ViiV Healthcare.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveAdenineAdolescentAdultAlanineAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesBody CompositionBody WeightCyclopropanesDuration of TherapyEmtricitabineFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV-1AdenineAlanineAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzEmtricitabineHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingOxazinesPiperazinesPyridonesTenofovirtenofovir alafenamide

Identifiers

PMID33010240
OpenAlexW3090200844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.