Trial reportJournal of diabetes investigation2022

Renal, cardiovascular and safety outcomes of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy in East and South-East Asian countries: Results from the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation Trial.

Takashi Wada, Kazumi Mori-Anai, Yutaka Kawaguchi, Hideyuki Katsumata, Hidetaka Tsuda, Mitsutaka Iida, Kenji Arakawa, Meg J Jardine

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2022. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · ckd, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.540.35 to 0.84
Canagliflozin lowered the risk of primary outcome (composite of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine level, or renal or cardiovascular death) in EA participants (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.84).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

SGLT2 inhibitors×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

22 readable studies in this cell: 9 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 9 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
1 · no effect
NCT0546531762,197 enrolled · 2022
HR 0.750.65 to 0.86
NCT0399313226,774 enrolled · 2018
HR 1.010.91 to 1.11
NCT0173053417,190 enrolled · 2013
HR 0.930.84 to 1.03
NCT0493781616,746 enrolled · 2021
HR 1.000.83 to 1.20
NCT045096746,522 enrolled · 2020
HR 0.900.76 to 1.06
NCT036192136,263 enrolled · 2018
HR 0.820.73 to 0.92
NCT030579515,988 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.790.69 to 0.90
NCT019897545,813 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.720.55 to 0.94
NCT020657914,401 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.700.59 to 0.82
NCT010326294,330 enrolled · 2009
HR 0.930.78 to 1.12
NCT045647424,017 enrolled · 2020
Win Ratio (WR) 1.341.20 to 1.50
NCT030579773,730 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.750.65 to 0.86

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Takashi WadaDepartment of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kazumi Mori-AnaiIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7353-4201
Yutaka KawaguchiIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideyuki KatsumataIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetaka TsudaIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsutaka IidaIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji ArakawaIkuyaku. Integrated Value Development Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-9491
Meg J JardineThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0160-2375
Mitsubishi Group (Japan) · JPKanazawa University · JPThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

AIMS/

introductionThe sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, canagliflozin, reduced kidney failure and cardiovascular events in the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial. We carried out a post-hoc analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in a subgroup of participants in East and South-East Asian (EA) countries who are at high risk of renal complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m

resultsOf 4,401 participants, 604 (13.7%) were from EA countries; 301 and 303 were assigned to the canagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively. Canagliflozin lowered the risk of primary outcome (composite of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine level, or renal or cardiovascular death) in EA participants (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.84). The effects of canagliflozin on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in EA participants were generally similar to those of the remaining participants. Safety outcomes were similar between the EA and non-EA participants.

conclusionsIn the CREDENCE trial, the risk of renal and cardiovascular events was safely reduced in participants from EA countries at high risk of renal events.

Indexed as

AdultAlbuminuriaAsia, EasternAsia, SoutheasternCanagliflozinCardiovascular DiseasesCreatinineDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyKidney Failure, ChronicMaleCanagliflozinCreatinineSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsCanagliflozinCREDENCENephropathy

Identifiers

PMID34212533
PMCPMC8756319
OpenAlexW3173377533

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.