SynthesisCardiovascular drugs and therapy2024
Efficacy and Safety of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early-life high-dose omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation reduces risk of childhood asthma/wheezing: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Supplements and Cardiovascular Disease Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Dates, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, Dietary Fiber, and Probiotics as Potential Complementary Modulators of Gut Microbiota and Oxidative Stress: An Integrative Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeted Supplementation and Nutritional Strategies for Healthy Aging: A Review of Physiological and Molecular Benefits.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Article
- A to Z of Health: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Multivitamin-Multimineral and Nutraceutical Supplementation.Cureus · 2026Review
- Comparative Lipidomics Unveils Species-Specific Lipid Signatures in ThreeFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimal Medical Therapy Targeting Lipids and Inflammation for Secondary Prevention in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- [Food supplements and fortified foods: benefits, risks and approaches to consumer protection].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Identification of Priority Nutrients in the US: Targeting Malnutrition to Address Diet-Related Disease Across the Lifespan.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Serum Fetuin-A Levels in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Morbidity-bridging metabolic pathways: linking early cardiovascular disease risk and depression symptoms using a multi-modal approach.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Enhancing cardiac repair post-myocardial infarction: a study on GATM/Gel hydrogel therapeutics.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Article
- Article
- Retrospective analysis of omega-3 fatty acids and the DASH diet in hyperlipidemia and hypertension management among obese individuals.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The NMR-measured omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio improves cardiovascular risk prediction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Kynurenic Acid Is a Predictive Prognostic Metabolic Marker in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Value of Meta-Analysis in Disease Prevention and Control: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is widely accepted that omega-3 fatty acids are beneficial in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but many large randomized controlled trial studies and meta-analyses have come to different conclusions. The evidence for omega-3 fatty acids supplementation to prevent cardiovascular disease remains insufficient. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several types of omega-3 fatty acids supplements.
methodsWe comprehensively searched the online database and found 15 RCTs. The primary efficacy outcomes included major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. The safety endpoints included gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, and cancer. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the main characteristics of the population, and the dose-response relationship of omega-3 fatty acids was evaluated by meta-regression. All results were calculated by the random effect model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using chi-square tests and quantified using I-square statistics.
resultsThe incidence of major cardiovascular events (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.91 to 0.99, P = 0.026), myocardial infarction (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.98; P = 0.021), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.88 to 0.99; P = 0.028) was reduced in the omega-3 fatty acid group compared with the control group. An increased risk of atrial fibrillation (RR 1.25, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.41; P = 0.000) was observed in patients in the omega-3 fatty acid group. No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in heart failure, stroke, and all-cause death. For safety endpoints, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, and cancer. Subgroup analysis showed that the cardiovascular benefit of omega-3 fatty acids was primarily attributable to the prescription of EPA ethyl ester. Omega-3 fatty acids may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors, and reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in patients without cardiovascular disease; however, they may increase the risk of stroke in patients with myocardial infarction. In addition, prescription omega-3 acid ethyl ester has a good safety profile, and prescription EPA ethyl ester has a high risk of bleeding.
conclusionModerate evidence showed that the use of omega-3 fatty acids may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. Compared to other types of omega-3 fatty acids supplements, we support the use of prescription EPA ethyl ester formulations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but the potential risk of atrial fibrillation and bleeding cannot be ignored. It is important to note that omega-3 fatty acids should be applied with caution in patients with previous myocardial infarction, which may increase the risk of stroke. Finally, omega-3 fatty acids are relatively safe and in general do not increase gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, or cancer, but attention needs to be paid to the risk of bleeding with prescription EPA ethyl ester formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.