ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Effect of
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective efficacy of a novel dual-pronged strategy combining the probiotic Lactobacillus casei and Microalga Chlorella vulgaris in preventing postmenopausal bone loss in ovariectomized rats.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- The gut-bone axis: impact of diet on gut microbiome and osteoporosis.Bone research · 2026Review
- The role of biotics and bioactive compounds in sports injuries: a narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- The role of gut microbiota in osteoporosis: underlying mechanisms, clinical associations, and emerging biomaterials.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiota Modulation in Osteoporosis: Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Natural Compounds.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota dysbiosis affects the local renin-angiotensin system to induce osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Probiotics and nanoparticle-mediated nutrient delivery in the management of transfusion-supported diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Characterization of fermented foods: bone health.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Review
- From gut to bone: deciphering the impact of gut microbiota on osteoporosis pathogenesis and management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Review
- The Potential Value of Probiotics after Dental Implant Placement.Microorganisms · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interaction between the gut microbiota and the host has been described experimentally by germ-free animals or by antibiotic-disturbed gut microbiota. Studies on germ-free mice have shown that gut microbiota is critical for bone growth and development in mice, emphasizing that microbiota dysbiosis may interfere with normal bone development processes. This study aimed to clarify the effect of antibiotic treatment on disturbed gut microbiota on bone development in mice and to investigate the effect of probiotic treatment on fracture healing in mice with dysbiosis. Our results showed that 4 weeks old female Kunming mice showed significantly lower abundance and diversity of the gut microbiota and significantly lower bone mineral density after 12 weeks of antibiotic treatment and significantly increased levels of RANKL and Ang II in serum (p<0.05). Mice with dysbiosis received 5 mL of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.