SynthesisThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2024
Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of adverse effects attributed to statin therapy in product labels: a meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Ezetimibe and the risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Advances in statin adverse reactions and the potential mechanisms: A systematic review.Journal of advanced research · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lipids in health and disease · 2024 · on this mapPooled it
- Dual modulation of lipid and glucose metabolism by a nutraceutical combination in patients at cardiometabolic risk: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025 · on this mapTrial
- Bempedoic Acid for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in People With Obesity: A CLEAR Outcomes Subset Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Diabetes Risk Factors in People With HIV Receiving Pitavastatin Versus Placebo for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention : A Randomized Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Trial
- Cardiovascular event rate modifies response to pharmacologic LDL-C lowering in primary prevention: implications of a systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on statin-induced impaired glucose tolerance: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement.European heart journal · 2026Article
- [Austrian lipid consensus : Interdisciplinary evidence-based recommendations on prevention and treatment of lipid-associated diseases from 15 medical specialist societies].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Ethnic and Gender Disparities in Risk Factors for Prediabetes-A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis in Southern Israel.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Drug targets for lipid modification and risk of type 2 diabetes: a cis-Mendelian randomization study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- The role of bempedoic acid in the management of dyslipidaemia in people with diabetes: an expert opinion of Italian diabetologists.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Review
- [Genetic, endocrine, drug-induced and pancreatogenic forms of diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe as an alternative to high-intensity statin therapy.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- HMGCR and Rosuvastatin Regulates GLP-1 Secretion and Expression-A Translational Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Lipid management in type 2 diabetes and non-HDL-cholesterol: target all atherogenic lipoproteins.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Review
- HMGCR genetic variation and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes in statin users.Human genomics · 2026Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious meta-analyses of summary data from randomised controlled trials have shown that statin therapy increases the risk of diabetes, but less is known about the size or timing of this effect, or who is at greatest risk. We aimed to address these gaps in knowledge through analysis of individual participant data from large, long-term, randomised, double-blind trials of statin therapy.
methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials of statin therapy that participated in the CTT Collaboration. All double-blind randomised controlled trials of statin therapy of at least 2 years' scheduled duration and with at least 1000 participants were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. All recorded diabetes-related adverse events, treatments, and measures of glycaemia were sought from eligible trials. Meta-analyses assessed the effects of allocation to statin therapy on new-onset diabetes (defined by diabetes-related adverse events, use of new glucose-lowering medications, glucose concentrations, or HbA
findingsOf the trials participating in the CTT Collaboration, 19 trials compared statin versus placebo (123 940 participants, 25 701 [21%] with diabetes; median follow-up of 4·3 years), and four trials compared more versus less intensive statin therapy (30 724 participants, 5340 [17%] with diabetes, median follow-up of 4·9 years). Compared with placebo, allocation to low-intensity or moderate-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 10% proportional increase in new-onset diabetes (2420 of 39 179 participants assigned to receive a statin [1·3% per year] vs 2214 of 39 266 participants assigned to receive placebo [1·2% per year]; rate ratio [RR] 1·10, 95% CI 1·04-1·16), and allocation to high-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 36% proportional increase (1221 of 9935 participants assigned to receive a statin [4·8% per year] vs 905 of 9859 participants assigned to receive placebo [3·5% per year]; 1·36, 1·25-1·48). For each trial, the rate of new-onset diabetes among participants allocated to receive placebo depended mostly on the proportion of participants who had at least one follow-up HbA
interpretationStatins cause a moderate dose-dependent increase in new diagnoses of diabetes that is consistent with a small upwards shift in glycaemia, with the majority of new diagnoses of diabetes occurring in people with baseline glycaemic markers that are close to the diagnostic threshold for diabetes. Importantly, however, any theoretical adverse effects of statins on cardiovascular risk that might arise from these small increases in glycaemia (or, indeed, from any other mechanism) are already accounted for in the overall reduction in cardiovascular risk that is seen with statin therapy in these trials. These findings should further inform clinical guidelines regarding clinical management of people taking statin therapy.
fundingBritish Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.