Trial reportJAMA network open2024
A 5:2 Intermittent Fasting Meal Replacement Diet and Glycemic Control for Adults With Diabetes: The EARLY Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
From baseline to week 16, participants in the 5:2 MR group showed the greatest reduction in HbA1c (least-squares mean [LSM], -1.9% [SE, 0.2%]), significantly greater than patients receiving metformin (LSM, -1.6% [SE, 0.2%]; adjusted LSM difference, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.4% to -0.1%]) and empagliflozin (LSM, -1.5% [SE, 0.2%]; adjusted LSM difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -0.6% to -0.2%]).
From baseline to week 16, participants in the 5:2 MR group showed the greatest reduction in HbA1c (least-squares mean [LSM], -1.9% [SE, 0.2%]), significantly greater than patients receiving metformin (LSM, -1.6% [SE, 0.2%]; adjusted LSM difference, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.4% to -0.1%]) and empagliflozin (LSM, -1.5% [SE, 0.2%]; adjusted LSM difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -0.6% to -0.2%]).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Metformin×glycemic control
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →40 readable studies in this cell: 41 favour the treatment, 12 find no difference, 8 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
SGLT2 inhibitors×glycemic control
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →40 readable studies in this cell: 81 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 4 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of intermittent fasting during weight reduction in people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- Intermittent fasting to treat diabetes: time to update clinical practice guidelines.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026Review
- Intermittent fasting in diabetic retinopathy: microbiome modulation, mechanisms, and clinical insights.Cardiovascular endocrinology & metabolism · 2026Review
- Sexual Dimorphism and Menopausal Transition: A Narrative Review of the Metabolic and Physical Effects of Intermittent Fasting.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Interplay Between Autophagy, Cellular Senescence, and Brain Aging: Neuroprotective Implications of Intermittent Fasting.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Precision Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Through Molecular Nutrigenomic and Epigenetic Modulation of Insulin Signaling and Glucose Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Metabolic and molecular evaluation of Moringa oleifera-supplemented ketogenic meal replacement in healthy C57BL/6 mice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Tailored Diabetes Education Program for Rural Residents.Journal of Appalachian health · 2026Article
- Intermittent energy restriction and risk of physician-diagnosed diabetes progression: a propensity-weighted real-world cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Type 5 diabetes mellitus: nutritional-imprinted β-cell insufficiency, diagnostic gaps, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Intermittent Fasting: Efficacy, Safety, and Its Impact on Body Weight, Glucose Metabolism, and Gut Microbiota.Cureus · 2025Review
- Effect of intermittent fasting on diabetic patients-A narrative review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Review
- Effect of intermittent fasting, portfolio-moderate-carbohydrate, and anti-inflammatory diets on cardio-metabolic status in pre-diabetic patients; an open-label randomized clinical trial.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Multi-strain probiotics attenuate carbohydrate-lipid metabolic dysregulation in type 2 diabetic rats via gut-liver axis modulation.mSystems · 2025Article
- The effectiveness of self-directed meal replacement-assisted intermittent fasting in adults.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review about Metabolic Pathways, Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications of Intermittent Fasting as Autophagy Promotor.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- The cyclic metabolic switching theory of intermittent fasting.Nature metabolism · 2025Review
- Overcoming dietary complexity in type 2 diabetes: influencing factors and coping strategies.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Intermittent and periodic fasting in the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025Article
- Effect of the 5:2 Diet on Weight Loss and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Overweight and/or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
Importance: An intermittent fasting plan consisting of 2 nonconsecutive fasting days and 5 days of habitual intake per week and meal replacement diet (5:2 MR) could provide additional benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the 5:2 MR on glycemic control among patients with early type 2 diabetes compared with metformin and empagliflozin. Design, Setting, and Participants: The EARLY (Exploration of Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Overweight/Obese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) study is a randomized, open-label, active parallel-controlled clinical trial conducted between November 13, 2020, and December 29, 2022, in 9 centers across China. A total of 509 eligible patients underwent screening, out of which 405 were randomly assigned to 3 groups and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either metformin, empagliflozin, or 5:2 MR. The treatment was 16 weeks, with an 8-week follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level from baseline to 16 weeks. Secondary end points included changes in body weight, anthropometric measurements, and biochemical parameters. Results: Of the 405 randomized participants (265 men [65.4%]; mean [SD] age, 45.5 [11.0] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 29.5 [4.1]; and mean [SD] HbA1c level, 7.9% [0.6%]), 332 completed the 16-week treatment. From baseline to week 16, participants in the 5:2 MR group showed the greatest reduction in HbA1c (least-squares mean [LSM], -1.9% [SE, 0.2%]), significantly greater than patients receiving metformin (LSM, -1.6% [SE, 0.2%]; adjusted LSM difference, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.4% to -0.1%]) and empagliflozin (LSM, -1.5% [SE, 0.2%]; adjusted LSM difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -0.6% to -0.2%]). At week 16, the mean weight loss in the 5:2 MR group (LSM, -9.7 kg [SE, 2.2 kg]) was greater than that in the metformin group (LSM, -5.5 kg [SE, 2.3 kg]) and empagliflozin group (LSM, -5.8 kg [SE, 2.3 kg]). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial of Chinese adults with overweight or obesity and with early type 2 diabetes found that 5:2 MR could improve glycemic outcomes and weight loss in the short term compared with metformin or empagliflozin, making it a promising initial intervention and early management for type 2 diabetes. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000040656.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.