Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39840246›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2025

Cell-Based Meat Safety and Regulatory Approaches: A Comprehensive Review.

Allah Bakhsh, Bosung Kim, Ismail Ishamri, Seongho Choi, Xiangzi Li, Qiang Li, Sun Jin Hur, Sungkwon Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Consumer and Social Perspectives to Cultivated Meat.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Bioprocess Engineering for Cultivated Meat.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Starch-Based Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production: Challenges and Perspectives.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Allah BakhshDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7866-1736
Bosung KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5417-0238
Ismail IshamriFaculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut 22200, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4820-8292
Seongho ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-0218
Xiangzi LiEngineering Research Center of North-East Cold Region Beef Cattle Science & Technology Innovation, Ministry of Education, Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-3847
Qiang LiEngineering Research Center of North-East Cold Region Beef Cattle Science & Technology Innovation, Ministry of Education, Department of Animal Science, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2722-1324
Sun Jin HurDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-5852
Sungkwon ParkDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7684-9719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based meat (CBM) technology is a highly promising alternative to traditional animal agriculture, with considerable advantages in terms of sustainability, animal welfare, and food security. Nonetheless, CBM's successful commercialization is dependent on efficiently dealing with several critical concerns, including ensuring biological, chemical, and nutritional safety as well as navigating the global regulatory framework. To ensure CBM's biological safety, detecting and mitigating any potential hazards introduced during the manufacturing process is crucial. Concerns include microbial contamination, the utilization of animal-derived growth media, and the risk of viral or prion infection. Similarly, chemical hazards include residues from growth media, scaffolding materials, and other bioprocessing agents. For consumer acceptance, CBM's nutritional qualities should be comparable to those of conventional meat, indicating adequate protein content, essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals. Additionally, CBM's safety in terms of allergenicity and the presence of anti-nutritional factors must be rigorously assessed. Advances in cell culture techniques and biomanufacturing methods are requisite to achieving high-quality CBM with desirable nutritional attributes. The regulatory framework for CBM is actively expanding, with significant regional variations. Singapore is currently the only country that has received approval for the market placement of CBM, although the United States has developed a regulatory structure involving the United States Department of Agriculture and Food and Drug Administration. As CBM holds great potential as a sustainable and ethical alternative to conventional meat, addressing challenges related to biological and chemical safety, nutritional quality, and regulatory approval is essential for its successful market integration.

Indexed as

biological safetycell-based meatchemical safetynutritional safetyregulatory aspects

Identifiers

PMID39840246
PMCPMC11743846

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.