ReviewJournal of food science2025
Seaweed Proteins: Properties, Extraction, Challenges, and Prospects.
Review in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Red Seaweed-Derived Phycobiliproteins: Marine Bioactive Colorants with Functional Health Properties.Marine drugs · 2026Review
- Alcalase-Flavourzyme Red Seaweed Hydrolysates as Antioxidants to Enhance Oxidative Stability of DHA Nanoemulsions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Macroalgal Peptides with Predicted α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity: Preparation and Molecular Docking.Marine drugs · 2026Article
- Metal-Chelating Macroalgal Extract as a Marine Antioxidant for Stabilizing DHA Nanoemulsions.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Purification, Identification, andMarine drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing global population and increasing demand for sustainable protein sources have intensified interest in seaweed as a viable plant-based alternative. Seaweed-derived proteins and peptides are rich in essential amino acids and exhibit promising functional and bioactive properties, making them attractive for food applications. However, several challenges hinder their widespread use, including difficulties in protein extraction and purification, the presence of potentially harmful compounds, and limited digestibility of the extracted proteins. This review critically examines the nutritional, functional, and bioactive properties of proteins and peptides derived from seaweed, while also addressing key obstacles related to extraction and application. Specific focus is placed on issues such as the rigidity of the seaweed cell wall, low protein solubility, digestibility, and the presence of antinutritional factors, toxic compounds, and allergens. Given that protein quantification remains a significant challenge in this field, current quantification methods and their limitations are also reviewed. Furthermore, this study provides a critical evaluation of the extraction methods employed for isolating proteins and peptides from seaweed. This review also emphasizes the importance of adopting a biorefinery perspective for seaweed protein extraction to ensure the efficient and sustainable utilization of the entire seaweed biomass. Moreover, this review examines the ongoing commercial development of seaweed protein and its potential for market integration. In conclusion, future perspectives are discussed, including the potential of bottom-up approaches, the integration of seaweed-derived proteins and peptides into food systems, and the importance of understanding their interactions with other biomolecules, which may influence their functional and nutritional properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.