ReviewCurrent research in food science2025
A systematic review of data and models for predicting food flavor and texture.
Review in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Taste Profile Assessment of Underexplored Amino Acids and Protein Derivatives in Umami and Koku.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Single nucleotide polymorphism information estimates breed and variety composition ratio in food.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Article
- Computational Advances in Taste Perception: From Ion Channels and Taste Receptors to Neural Coding.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition and Dietetics: A Comprehensive Review of Current Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review systematically examines the current landscape of data resources and computational models for predicting food flavor and texture. Taste is the most well-defined sensory component, and molecular classification is aligned with the five basic tastes: sweet, sour, bitter, salty, and umami. Odor prediction, while similar in premise, faces greater challenges due to the vast and diverse range of detectable odors and a lack of standardized olfactory metrics. Machine learning models, including graph neural networks and deep learning methods, have shown promise in identifying taste and odor compounds. Texture prediction has seen comparatively less research interest but may prove to be impactful in food quality control pipelines, although more work is needed in creating robust food texture datasets. The review highlights the growing availability of specialized databases which support the development and benchmarking of predictive models. Despite recent advancements, gaps remain in mapping sensory spaces and incorporating receptor-level data. Future directions include creating more extensive and high-quality datasets, improving model explainability, and exploring innovative applications in food design, fragrance, pharmaceuticals, and environmental monitoring. This work provides a comprehensive resource for researchers aiming to advance the field of flavor and texture prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.