Statins × adverse events & safety

Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Treatment persistence, lipid lowering, and 3-year clinical outcomes in patients at very high cardiovascular risk on PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies.

Klaus G Parhofer et al.PubMed ↗Full text ↗Publisher ↗

  • Baseline statin intolerancelooks bad hereHigher discontinuation rates of PCSK9-mAb.Correlation only, not a test of it.

What moved togetherboth groups pooled, not the treatment’s effect

Correlation, not cause

Baseline statin intolerance went with higher discontinuation rates of PCSK9-mAb

2.3×

baseline statin intolerance vs no baseline statin intolerance

Bigger than 8 in 10 for adverse events & safety

As reported

HR 2.3, no interval

Who was studied, and how

1,695people with cardiovascular disease, in this paper

Already taking baseline statin intolerance, or nottheir own situation, not assigned

on baseline statin intolerance
not on baseline statin intolerance

Baseline statin intolerance went with higher discontinuation rates of PCSK9-mAb2.3×

correlation, not a test

the abstract, start to end

with baseline statin intolerance (HR = 2.3, p = 0.012).

← favours treatmentfavours comparator →
could be chance
No interval given · direction only, strength unknown
Discontinuation rates of PCSK9-mAbbaseline statin intolerance vs no baseline statin intolerance
HR 2.3
StatinsAdverse events & safety
1 / 4

1 paper cites it

2026
this papercites it

The trial

Full record →Abstract, authors, funding and every citing paper · PMID 40760109