Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Treatment persistence, lipid lowering, and 3-year clinical outcomes in patients at very high cardiovascular risk on PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies.

Klaus G Parhofer, David Pittrow, Andreas L Birkenfeld, Uwe Fraass, Bernd Hohenstein, Carsten Siegert, Jens Klotsche, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Stefan Dexl, Volker J J Schettler and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It reports registered trial NCT03110432. Cited by 1 paper.

1number the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Discontinuation rates of PCSK9-mAbbaseline statin intolerance vs no baseline statin intolerancean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
HR 2.30p = 0.012
Higher discontinuation rates of PCSK9-mAb were associated with baseline statin intolerance (HR = 2.3, p = 0.012).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×adverse events & safety

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

11 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 7 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.16contested · 1 family supports, 4 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT002899002,340 enrolled · 2006
Δ 13.79.40 to 18.0
NCT01294683977 enrolled · 2011
Δ -1.03-7.30 to 5.25
NCT00728988499 enrolled · 2008
Δ 1.00-7.30 to 9.30
NCT01678820299 enrolled · 2012
Δ -0.40-10.2 to 9.30

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03110432 completed

Prospective German Very High Cardiovascular Risk Patients Dyslipidemia Treatment Indication Registry

Ran2017Enrolled1,695Registered outcomes4Posted comparisons0ConditionsDyslipoproteinemias, Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia, Familial Hypercholesterolemia - Homozygous, Hypercholesterolemia, FamilialArmsPCSK9 Inhibitor [EPC], Standard lipid lowering therapy
PMID 40270128PMID 36178485other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Klaus G ParhoferMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Deutschland. klaus.parhofer@med.uni-muenchen.de.
David PittrowInstitut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Medizinische Fakulät, Technische Universität, Dresden, Deutschland.
Andreas L BirkenfeldInnere Medizin IV - Diabetologie, Endokrinologie und Nephrologie am Universitätsklinikum, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Uwe FraassAmgen GmbH, München, Deutschland.
Bernd HohensteinNephrologisches Zentrum, Villingen-Schwenningen, Deutschland.
Carsten SiegertAmgen GmbH, München, Deutschland.
Jens KlotscheEpidemiologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Deutschland.
Elisabeth Steinhagen-ThiessenMedizinische Klinik für Endokrinologie und Stoffwechselmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan DexlAmgen GmbH, München, Deutschland.
Volker J J SchettlerNephrologisches Zentrum, Göttingen, Germany.
Ulrich LaufsKlinik und Poliklinik Für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

In a cohort of patients with dyslipidemia at very high cardiovascular risk, we investigated differences in LDL-C lipid target achievement, clinical outcomes, and persistence rates between users and non-users of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9-mAb) over a 3-year observation period. The prospective, multi-center observational study included 1695 patients with dyslipidemia. Eligible patients were adults with familial or non-familial hypercholesterolemia, mixed dyslipidemia, or other therapy-refractory lipid disorders in line with the G-BA reimbursement regulations. Treatment decisions, including PCSK9-mAb administration, were made at the discretion of the treating physician. At baseline, 804 (47.4%) patients received PCSK9-mAb therapy, and 891 (52.5%) did not. There were 42 (4.7%) new PCSK9-mAb receivers during the follow-up. Median propensity-score adjusted LDL-C levels in PCSK9-mAb non-receivers decreased over time from 106.0 to 68.4 mg/dL. LDL-C in PCSK9-mAb receivers dropped from 112.5 mg/dL at baseline to 58.0 mg/dL at 3 years, consistently outperforming non-receivers. Target LDL-C goal attainment (< 55mg/dL) after 3 years was higher in the PCSK9-mAb group (43.2% vs. 34.5%). Persistence with PCSK9-mAb therapy over 3 years since treatment initiation was high (91.5%). Higher discontinuation rates of PCSK9-mAb were associated with baseline statin intolerance (HR = 2.3, p = 0.012). The use of PCSK9-mAb was associated with numerically fewer cardiovascular events (9.3 versus 15.7 per 100 patient-years, p not significant) and lower hospitalization rates due to cardiovascular events compared to non-users (6.3 versus 12.4 per 100 patient years, p = 0.001). This study underscores the real-world efficacy and safety of PCSK9-mAb therapy in achieving sustained LDL-C reduction. Identifier: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03110432.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAnticholesteremic AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLDyslipidemiasPCSK9 InhibitorsAgedBiomarkersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProprotein Convertase 9Prospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAnticholesteremic AgentsBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLPCSK9 InhibitorsPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9High riskLDL cholesterolPersistenceReal word evidenceSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID40760109
PMCPMC12823742

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.