Evidence mapPaperPMID 41146181Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diabetology2025

Drug-coated balloons and diabetes: a review.

Marco Frazzetto, Sara Malakouti, Bharat Khialani, Filippo Luca Gurgoglione, Bernardo Cortese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco FrazzettoDCB Academy, Milan, Italy.
Sara MalakoutiDCB Academy, Milan, Italy.
Bharat KhialaniDCB Academy, Milan, Italy.
Filippo Luca GurgoglioneDCB Academy, Milan, Italy.
Bernardo CorteseDCB Academy, Milan, Italy. bcortese@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major contributor to coronary artery disease (CAD) worldwide. Moreover, DM is associated with more extensive atherosclerotic disease, often with multivessel involvement and complex and vulnerable plaque characteristics, as well as an enhanced thrombotic and inflammatory environment. Altogether, these factors increase the risk of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to individuals with normal glucose levels. Despite latest generation drug-eluting stents provide better overall clinical outcomes compared with earlier generations, diabetic patients still experience short- and long-term stent-related complications, such as target-lesion revascularization, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis. The development of drug-coated balloons (DCB) has provided a promising alternative in this setting. This innovative technology relies on the delivery of an antiproliferative agent directly to the target lesion without leaving any permanent metallic scaffold. However, the benefit of DCB-based revascularization for CAD patients with DM compared to other techniques as well as the effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative management in improving outcomes have not been fully addressed. This review aims to discuss the impact of DM pathophysiology on the outcomes of PCI and the potential mechanistic benefit of DCB angioplasty in diabetic patients with CAD. Finally, we summarize the results from all current evidence comparing DCB-based to other PCI techniques and propose an individualized approach for treating diabetic patients with CAD.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CathetersCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes MellitusAnimalsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary artery diseaseDiabetes mellitusDrug-coated balloonsDrug-eluting stentsPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID41146181
PMCPMC12560524

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.