ReviewCardiovascular diabetology2025
Drug-coated balloons and diabetes: a review.
Review in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized controlled trial of drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty in diabetic patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans: outcomes in ankle-brachial index and restenosis rate.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of metformin in diabetic patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): protective effect is modified by procedural complexity.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026 · on this mapObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major contributor to coronary artery disease (CAD) worldwide. Moreover, DM is associated with more extensive atherosclerotic disease, often with multivessel involvement and complex and vulnerable plaque characteristics, as well as an enhanced thrombotic and inflammatory environment. Altogether, these factors increase the risk of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to individuals with normal glucose levels. Despite latest generation drug-eluting stents provide better overall clinical outcomes compared with earlier generations, diabetic patients still experience short- and long-term stent-related complications, such as target-lesion revascularization, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis. The development of drug-coated balloons (DCB) has provided a promising alternative in this setting. This innovative technology relies on the delivery of an antiproliferative agent directly to the target lesion without leaving any permanent metallic scaffold. However, the benefit of DCB-based revascularization for CAD patients with DM compared to other techniques as well as the effectiveness of preoperative and postoperative management in improving outcomes have not been fully addressed. This review aims to discuss the impact of DM pathophysiology on the outcomes of PCI and the potential mechanistic benefit of DCB angioplasty in diabetic patients with CAD. Finally, we summarize the results from all current evidence comparing DCB-based to other PCI techniques and propose an individualized approach for treating diabetic patients with CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.