Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2026

Liraglutide in Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke or High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack With Type 2 Diabetes: The LAMP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Huili Zhu, Bin Yang, Longyan Lu, Yufeng Li, Rubo Sui, Kewei Liu, Suling Tan, Lihua Wang, Jianmin Qiu, Jianbin Zhong and 18 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2026. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it favours the comparator in 2. It reports registered trial NCT03948347. Cited by 6 papers.

2numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.521 · no effect
Excellent functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, ≤1)liraglutide vs control groupfavours the comparator · t2d, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
OR 1.951.28 to 3.00P = .002
A significantly higher proportion of patients (modified Rankin Scale score, ≤1) in the liraglutide group (274 [87.3%]) than in the control group (246 [77.8%]) achieved excellent functional outcomes (odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.28-3.00; P = .002).
Stroke recurrence (ischemic or hemorrhagic) after 90 daysliraglutide vs control groupfavours the treatment · t2d, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.560.34 to 0.91P = .02
Within 90 days, 25 patients (7.9%) in the liraglutide group and 44 (13.8%) in the control group experienced stroke recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91; P = .02).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GLP-1 receptor agonists×cardiovascular events

ContradictsOpen on the map →What to test next →

13 readable studies in this cell: 7 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 4 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 7 families support, 3 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.78This paper moves it by −0.28. It would be established.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper1,708 enrolled · 2019
OR 1.951.28 to 3.00
NCT0399313226,774 enrolled · 2018
HR 1.010.91 to 1.11
NCT0357459717,604 enrolled · 2018
HR 0.800.72 to 0.89
NCT013949529,901 enrolled · 2011
HR 0.880.79 to 0.99
NCT039143269,651 enrolled · 2019
HR 0.860.77 to 0.96
NCT011790489,341 enrolled · 2010
HR 0.870.78 to 0.97
NCT038191533,533 enrolled · 2019
HR 0.760.66 to 0.88
NCT017204463,297 enrolled · 2013
HR 0.740.58 to 0.95
NCT026927163,183 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.790.57 to 1.11
NCT05564039282 enrolled · 2022
OR 20.48.40 to 49.8

GLP-1 receptor agonists×adverse events & safety

ContradictsOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 47 favour the treatment, 14 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.02contested · 1 family supports, 41 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.02This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper1,708 enrolled · 2019
HR 0.560.34 to 0.91
NCT0399313226,774 enrolled · 2018
HR 1.010.91 to 1.11
HR 0.660.44 to 0.96
NCT013949529,901 enrolled · 2011
HR 0.930.77 to 1.12
NCT039143269,651 enrolled · 2019
HR 0.860.77 to 0.96
NCT011790489,341 enrolled · 2010
HR 0.880.81 to 0.96
NCT026927163,183 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.790.57 to 1.11
NCT035964501,278 enrolled · 2018
Treatment effect 1.361.03 to 1.79
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03948347 naunknown status

Liraglutide in Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke or High-risk Transient Ischemic Attack Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Blank-controlled,Blinded End-point Study.

Ran2019Enrolled1,708Registered outcomes3Posted comparisons0ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, Type 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsliraglutide
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Huili ZhuDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin YangDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Longyan LuDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yufeng LiDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Rubo SuiDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.
Kewei LiuDepartment of Neurology, People's Hospital of Longmen County, Longmen, China.
Suling TanDepartment of Neurology, People's Hospital of Xinfeng County, Xinfeng, China.
Lihua WangDepartment of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin. China.
Jianmin QiuDepartment of Neurology, the First Hospital of Putian, Putian, China.
Jianbin ZhongDepartment of Neurology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tongguo WeiDepartment of Neurology, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China.
Yuzhang BeiDepartment of Neurology, Liuyang Jili Hospital, Liuyang, China.
Jianmin HuangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, Baise, China.
Suping ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yan JiDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Clifford Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjun WuDepartment of Neurology, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.
Youjia LiDepartment of Neurology, the First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing, China.
Ying HuangDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College, Ganzhou, China.
Yangkun ChenDepartment of Neurology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Xiaoyun HuangDepartment of Neurology, Houjie Hospital, Dongguan City, Dongguan, China.
Guoyong ZengDepartment of Neurology, Ganzhou people's Hospital, Ganzhou, China.
Yusheng ZhangDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Lian HuangDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao LiBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiangbing WangRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersy.
Yongjun WangBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Anding XuDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
LAMP Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Importance: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with high-risk type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, dedicated randomized clinical trials that evaluate their efficacy in acute ischemic stroke are lacking. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of liraglutide in patients with T2D and minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). Design, Setting, and Participants: The LAMP trial was designed as a multicenter, controlled, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial and conducted at 27 hospitals in China from June 25, 2019, through December 27, 2023. The final follow-up was on March 24, 2024. Data were analyzed on May 1, 2024. The study included patients with T2D who had minor AIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤3) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 score [age, blood pressure elevation on first assessment after TIA, unilateral weakness, speech disturbance, duration of symptoms and diabetes] ≥4). Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized within 24 hours of symptom onset to the liraglutide group and the control group. Both groups received standard treatment according to the guidelines. The liraglutide group received liraglutide once daily for 90 days (0.6 mg for the first week, which was increased to 1.2 mg in the second week and followed by 1.8 mg until day 90) in addition to standard therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was stroke recurrence (ischemic or hemorrhagic) after 90 days, and the safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Results: In all, 636 patients (median [IQR] age, 63.5 [57.8-70.0] years; 231 female individuals [36.3%]) were randomized. Within 90 days, 25 patients (7.9%) in the liraglutide group and 44 (13.8%) in the control group experienced stroke recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91; P = .02). A significantly higher proportion of patients (modified Rankin Scale score, ≤1) in the liraglutide group (274 [87.3%]) than in the control group (246 [77.8%]) achieved excellent functional outcomes (odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.28-3.00; P = .002). The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality were low and similar between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The trial results suggest that among Chinese patients with T2D and minor AIS or high-risk TIA, liraglutide treatment might reduce stroke recurrence and improve 90-day outcomes. However, given the underpowered nature of the study, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03948347.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsIschemic Attack, TransientIschemic StrokeLiraglutideAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutide

Identifiers

PMID41182740
PMCPMC12584062

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.