Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41997450›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Current Evidence on Dietary Patterns and Consumer Food Choices in the Context of Climate and Environmental Change: A Global Perspective-A Report from the Agriculture and Diet: Value Added for Nutrition, Translation, and Adaptation in a Global Ecology (ADVANTAGE) Project Working Group 2.

Lindsey S Taillie, Karen R Siegel, Nicole T Blackstone, Jean M Kerver, Regan L Bailey, Priscilla Connors, Sylvia Rowe, Laina Ewoldt, Constantina Papoutsakis, Daniel J Raiten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lindsey S TaillieCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Karen R SiegelHubert Department of Global Health and Emory Global Diabetes Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Nicole T BlackstoneFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Jean M KerverDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Regan L BaileyBehavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, College of Medicine, and Institute for Connecting Nutrition and Health, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Priscilla ConnorsCollege of Merchandising, Hospitality, and Tourism, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.
Sylvia RoweSR Strategy, LLC, Washington, DC, United States.
Laina EwoldtDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Constantina PapoutsakisAcademy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, IL, United States.
Daniel J RaitenEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: raitend@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Development of a Total Nutrient IndexU01CA215834 · NCI · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI REGAN BAILEY, JANET A. TOOZE · 2017 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA215834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate and environmental change (CEC) are affecting food systems across the globe in myriad ways, yet there has historically been little focus on the role of CEC in influencing dietary patterns and consumer food choices. In this narrative review, we describe the global landscape of dietary patterns and consumer choice to set a baseline understanding of nutrition guidance and estimated food intake. Next, we consider trends in consumer choices across a pathway that includes consumer attitudes, knowledge, and preferences; food purchases and acquisition; food intake behaviors; and food waste. For each step on the pathway, we consider current evidence for how CEC is influencing choices, and identify key questions and data that need to be addressed to inform dietary guidance. We also use a socioecological model to show different levels of policy, community, interpersonal, and individual effects on food intake and their intersection with CEC. We find multifaceted mechanisms through which CEC is likely to influence consumer choices over time. Future dietary guidance should incorporate CEC context to ensure that recommendations are achievable for diverse populations in a food system increasingly likely to be affected by CEC.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConsumer BehaviorDietFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesAgricultureChoice BehaviorHumansNutrition Policyclimate changeconsumer choicesdietary patternsenvironmental changefood systems

Identifiers

PMID41997450
PMCPMC13185990

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.