Evidence mapPaperPMID 9742972Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)1998

Some answers, more controversy, from UKPDS. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study.

D M Nathan

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Rosiglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  7. Pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006 · on this map
    Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cardiovascular effects of anti-diabetes drugs.Expert opinion on drug safety · 2016
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Stickiness of the blues: Chronicity of depression.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D M NathanDiabetes Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminObesitySulfonylurea CompoundsBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminSulfonylurea Compounds

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.