Trial reportJAMA2001

Effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein levels: the pravastatin inflammation/CRP evaluation (PRINCE): a randomized trial and cohort study.

M A Albert, E Danielson, N Rifai, P M Ridker, PRINCE Investigators

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2001. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it . Cited by 434 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

2numbers the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
434citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
110.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-14.70 · no effect
Body weight & compositionfavours the treatment · head-to-head · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
median reduction -14.7P<.001
This effect was seen as early as 12 weeks (median reduction in CRP with pravastatin, 14.7%; P<.001) and was present among all prespecified subgroups according to sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, baseline lipid levels, presence of diabetes, and use of aspirin or hormone replacement therapy.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Inflammation & biomarkersdirection of benefit for this outcome is not defined · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
reduced -16.9P<.001
RESULTS: In the primary prevention trial, compared with placebo, pravastatin reduced median CRP levels by 16.9% (P<.001) at 24 weeks, reflecting a decrease of 0.02 mg/dL in the pravastatin group while no change in CRP levels was observed in the placebo group.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×body weight & composition

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

2 readable studies in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.25no deciding trial · 0 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
This paper · 2001
median reduction -14.7

Statins×inflammation & biomarkers

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

7 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 4 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.48contested · 2 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT002899002,340 enrolled · 2006
Δ -0.80-9.60 to 7.50
NCT00728988499 enrolled · 2008
Δ -29.5-216 to 157
NCT0219706520 enrolled · 2014
Δ 13.0

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

434 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,647 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pravastatin for lowering lipids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · on this map
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Residual inflammatory risk after contemporary lipid lowering therapy.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2020
    Pooled it
  12. Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.Seminars in nephrology · 2020
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

374 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M A AlbertCenter for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave E, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
E Danielson
N Rifai
P M Ridker
PRINCE Investigators
American Medical Association · USMass General Brigham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

contextPlasma levels of the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP) predict cardiovascular risk, and retrospective studies suggest that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) may lower CRP in a manner largely independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, prospective trial data directly evaluating this anti-inflammatory effect of statins are not available.

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that pravastatin has anti-inflammatory effects as evidenced by CRP reduction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsCommunity-based, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial including 1702 men and women with no prior history of cardiovascular disease (primary prevention cohort) and open-label study including 1182 patients with known cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention cohort) who provided at least baseline and 12-week blood samples. The study was conducted in US office-based practices from February to December 2000.

interventionsParticipants in the double-blind primary prevention trial were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d of pravastatin (n = 865) or placebo (n = 837) for 24 weeks. Participants in the secondary prevention cohort received 40 mg/d of open-label pravastatin for 24 weeks.

main outcome measureChange in CRP levels from baseline to 24 weeks.

resultsIn the primary prevention trial, compared with placebo, pravastatin reduced median CRP levels by 16.9% (P<.001) at 24 weeks, reflecting a decrease of 0.02 mg/dL in the pravastatin group while no change in CRP levels was observed in the placebo group. This effect was seen as early as 12 weeks (median reduction in CRP with pravastatin, 14.7%; P<.001) and was present among all prespecified subgroups according to sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, baseline lipid levels, presence of diabetes, and use of aspirin or hormone replacement therapy. No significant association was observed between baseline CRP and baseline LDL-C levels, end-of-study CRP and end-of-study LDL-C levels, or change in CRP and change in LDL-C levels over time. In linear regression analyses, the only significant predictors of change in CRP on a log scale were randomized pravastatin allocation and baseline CRP levels (P<.001 for both). Similar reductions in CRP levels were observed at 12 weeks (-14.3%) and 24 weeks (-13.1%) in the secondary prevention cohort treated with pravastatin (P<.005 for both).

conclusionsIn this prospective trial, pravastatin reduced CRP levels at both 12 and 24 weeks in a largely LDL-C-independent manner. These data provide evidence that statins may have anti-inflammatory effects in addition to lipid-lowering effects.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPravastatinAnticholesteremic AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPravastatin

Identifiers

PMID11434828
OpenAlexW2070396041

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.