Trial reportJAMA2001
Effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein levels: the pravastatin inflammation/CRP evaluation (PRINCE): a randomized trial and cohort study.
Trial report in JAMA, 2001. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it . Cited by 434 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
This effect was seen as early as 12 weeks (median reduction in CRP with pravastatin, 14.7%; P<.001) and was present among all prespecified subgroups according to sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, baseline lipid levels, presence of diabetes, and use of aspirin or hormone replacement therapy.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
RESULTS: In the primary prevention trial, compared with placebo, pravastatin reduced median CRP levels by 16.9% (P<.001) at 24 weeks, reflecting a decrease of 0.02 mg/dL in the pravastatin group while no change in CRP levels was observed in the placebo group.
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Statins×body weight & composition
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →2 readable studies in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
Statins×inflammation & biomarkers
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →7 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 4 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
434 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,647 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-inflammatory effects of tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Statin Therapy as Primary Prevention for Persons With HIV: A Synopsis of Recommendations From the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines Panel.Annals of internal medicine · 2025Guideline
- GWAS of CRP response to statins further supports the role of APOE in statin response: A GIST consortium study.Pharmacological research · 2025Pooled it
- Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Pravastatin for lowering lipids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · on this mapPooled it
- Role of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2022Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Pooled it
- The Predictive Potential of the Baseline C-Reactive Protein Levels for the Efficiency of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of various types and doses of statins on C-reactive protein levels in patients with dyslipidemia or coronary heart disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- The Effect of Statins on C-Reactive Protein in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Mediators of inflammation · 2021Pooled it
- Residual inflammatory risk after contemporary lipid lowering therapy.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2020Pooled it
- Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.Seminars in nephrology · 2020Pooled it
- Association of statin use and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lipids in health and disease · 2019 · on this mapPooled it
- Socioeconomic status in childhood and C reactive protein in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2017Pooled it
- Preliminary results of pravastatin on non-hemorrhagic vertebral artery dissection: an exploratory randomized and controlled study.BMC neurology · 2025Trial
- One-Year Effects of High-Intensity Statin on Bioactive Lipids: Findings From the JUPITER Trial.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024Trial
- Impact of RA treatment strategies on lipids and vascular inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: a secondary analysis of the TARGET randomized active comparator trial.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Trial
- Statin administration improves vascular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024Trial
- Preclinical cardiac organ damage during statin treatment in patients with inflammatory joint diseases: the RORA-AS statin intervention study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Trial
- A comparative study on the anti-inflammatory effect of angiotensin-receptor blockers & statins on rheumatoid arthritis disease activity.The Indian journal of medical research · 2020Trial
374 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
contextPlasma levels of the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP) predict cardiovascular risk, and retrospective studies suggest that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) may lower CRP in a manner largely independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, prospective trial data directly evaluating this anti-inflammatory effect of statins are not available.
objectiveTo test the hypothesis that pravastatin has anti-inflammatory effects as evidenced by CRP reduction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsCommunity-based, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial including 1702 men and women with no prior history of cardiovascular disease (primary prevention cohort) and open-label study including 1182 patients with known cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention cohort) who provided at least baseline and 12-week blood samples. The study was conducted in US office-based practices from February to December 2000.
interventionsParticipants in the double-blind primary prevention trial were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d of pravastatin (n = 865) or placebo (n = 837) for 24 weeks. Participants in the secondary prevention cohort received 40 mg/d of open-label pravastatin for 24 weeks.
main outcome measureChange in CRP levels from baseline to 24 weeks.
resultsIn the primary prevention trial, compared with placebo, pravastatin reduced median CRP levels by 16.9% (P<.001) at 24 weeks, reflecting a decrease of 0.02 mg/dL in the pravastatin group while no change in CRP levels was observed in the placebo group. This effect was seen as early as 12 weeks (median reduction in CRP with pravastatin, 14.7%; P<.001) and was present among all prespecified subgroups according to sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, baseline lipid levels, presence of diabetes, and use of aspirin or hormone replacement therapy. No significant association was observed between baseline CRP and baseline LDL-C levels, end-of-study CRP and end-of-study LDL-C levels, or change in CRP and change in LDL-C levels over time. In linear regression analyses, the only significant predictors of change in CRP on a log scale were randomized pravastatin allocation and baseline CRP levels (P<.001 for both). Similar reductions in CRP levels were observed at 12 weeks (-14.3%) and 24 weeks (-13.1%) in the secondary prevention cohort treated with pravastatin (P<.005 for both).
conclusionsIn this prospective trial, pravastatin reduced CRP levels at both 12 and 24 weeks in a largely LDL-C-independent manner. These data provide evidence that statins may have anti-inflammatory effects in addition to lipid-lowering effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.