Evidence mapPaperPMID 19221140Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009

Association between change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Matthias Briel, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, John J You, Paul J Karanicolas, Elie A Akl, Ping Wu, Boris Blechacz, Dirk Bassler, Xinge Wei, Asheer Sharman and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
58.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 488 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Niacin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017 · on this map
    Pooled it
  8. Fibrates for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease events.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016 · on this map
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  15. Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Matthias BrielDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada. brielm@uhbs.ch
Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez
John J You
Paul J Karanicolas
Elie A Akl
Ping Wu
Boris Blechacz
Dirk Bassler
Xinge Wei
Asheer Sharman
Irene Whitt
Suzana Alves da Silva
Zahira Khalid
Alain J Nordmann
Qi Zhou
Stephen D Walter
Noah Vale
Neera Bhatnagar
Christopher O'Regan
Edward J Mills
Heiner C Bucher
Victor M Montori
Gordon H Guyatt
McMaster University · CAMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHCanadian College of Naturopathic Medicine · CACentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESHospital Pró-Cardíaco · BRSt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEWestern University · CAWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association between treatment induced change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and total death, coronary heart disease death, and coronary heart disease events (coronary heart disease death and non-fatal myocardial infarction) adjusted for changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol and drug class in randomised trials of lipid modifying interventions.

designSystematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Central, CINAHL, and AMED to October 2006 supplemented by contact with experts in the field. STUDY SELECTION: In teams of two, reviewers independently determined eligibility of randomised trials that tested lipid modifying interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk, reported high density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality or myocardial infarctions separately for treatment groups, and treated and followed participants for at least six months. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Using standardised, pre-piloted forms, reviewers independently extracted relevant information from each article. The change in lipid concentrations for each trial and the weighted risk ratios for clinical outcomes were calculated.

resultsThe meta-regression analysis included 108 randomised trials involving 299 310 participants at risk of cardiovascular events. All analyses that adjusted for changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol showed no association between treatment induced change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk ratios for coronary heart disease deaths, coronary heart disease events, or total deaths. With all trials included, change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol explained almost no variability (<1%) in any of the outcomes. The change in the quotient of low density lipoprotein cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol did not explain more of the variability in any of the outcomes than did the change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol alone. For a 10 mg/dl (0.26 mmol/l) reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, the relative risk reduction was 7.2% (95% confidence interval 3.1% to 11%; P=0.001) for coronary heart disease deaths, 7.1% (4.5% to 9.8%; P<0.001) for coronary heart disease events, and 4.4% (1.6% to 7.2%; P=0.002) for total deaths, when adjusted for change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and drug class.

conclusionsAvailable data suggest that simply increasing the amount of circulating high density lipoprotein cholesterol does not reduce the risk of coronary heart disease events, coronary heart disease deaths, or total deaths. The results support reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol as the primary goal for lipid modifying interventions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLClinical Trials as TopicHumansHypolipidemic AgentsRegression AnalysisCholesterol, HDLHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19221140
PMCPMC2645847
OpenAlexW2108475045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.