Evidence mapPaperPMID 23219296Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology2013

Cardiovascular event reduction versus new-onset diabetes during atorvastatin therapy: effect of baseline risk factors for diabetes.

David D Waters, Jennifer E Ho, S Matthijs Boekholdt, David A DeMicco, John J P Kastelein, Michael Messig, Andrei Breazna, Terje R Pedersen

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02437084 (Relationship Between Insulin Resistance and Statin Induced Type 2 Diabetes, and Integrative Personal Omics Profiling), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02437084 phase4completedstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Relationship Between Insulin Resistance and Statin Induced Type 2 Diabetes, and Integrative Personal Omics Profiling

Ran2015Enrolled115Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons6ConditionsHyperlipidemia, Insulin Resistance, Type 2 DiabetesArmsAtorvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. THE IMPACT OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL: A REVIEW.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Statins Are Associated With Increased Insulin Resistance and Secretion.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021 · on this map
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David D WatersDivision of Cardiology, San Francisco General Hospital and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94114, USA. dwaters@medsfgh.ucsf.edu
Jennifer E Ho
S Matthijs Boekholdt
David A DeMicco
John J P Kastelein
Michael Messig
Andrei Breazna
Terje R Pedersen
Pfizer (United States) · USAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of new-onset diabetes (NOD) with cardiovascular (CV) event reduction at different levels of NOD risk.

backgroundStatins reduce the number of CV events but increase the incidence of NOD. We previously reported that 4 factors independently predicted NOD: fasting blood glucose >100 mg/dl, fasting triglycerides >150 mg/dl, body mass index >30 kg/m(2), and history of hypertension.

methodsWe compared NOD incidence with CV event reduction among 15,056 patients with coronary disease but without diabetes at baseline in the TNT (Treating to New Targets) (n = 7,595) and IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) (n = 7,461) trials. CV events included coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and resuscitated cardiac arrest.

resultsAmong 8,825 patients with 0 to 1 of the aforementioned NOD risk factors at baseline, NOD developed in 142 of 4,407 patients in the atorvastatin 80 mg group and in 148 of 4,418 in the atorvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 20 to 40 mg groups (3.22% vs. 3.35%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.77 to 1.22). Among the remaining 6,231 patients with 2 to 4 NOD risk factors, NOD developed in 448 of 3,128 in the atorvastatin 80 mg group and in 368 of 3,103 in the lower-dose groups (14.3% vs. 11.9%; HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.42; p = 0.0027). The number of CV events was significantly reduced with atorvastatin 80 mg in both NOD risk groups.

conclusionsCompared with lower-dose statin therapy, atorvastatin 80 mg/day did not increase the incidence of NOD in patients with 0 to 1 NOD risk factors but did, by 24%, among patients with 2 to 4 NOD risk factors. The number of CV events was significantly reduced with atorvastatin 80 mg in both NOD risk groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAtorvastatinCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart ArrestHeptanoic AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceMaleAtorvastatinHeptanoic AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrrolesSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID23219296
OpenAlexW34443605

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.