Evidence mapPaperPMID 25575403Full record

ReviewAtherosclerosis. Supplements2015

Could changes in adiponectin drive the effect of statins on the risk of new-onset diabetes? The case of pitavastatin.

Lorenzo Arnaboldi, Alberto Corsini

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Atherosclerosis. Supplements, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT04945122. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04945122 phase4unknown status

Comparison of Atorvastatin and Pitavastatin on the Effect of HbA1c in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Patients With Abnormal Glucose Metabolism: a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Ran2015Enrolled900Registered outcomes2Posted comparisons0ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction, Glucose Metabolism DisordersArmsAtorvastatin, Pitavastatin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Statin use in prediabetic patients: rationale and results to date.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo ArnaboldiDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari (DISFeB), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti, 9, 20133 Milano, Italy. Electronic address: lorenzo.arnaboldi@unimi.it.
Alberto CorsiniDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari (DISFeB), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti, 9, 20133 Milano, Italy; IRCCS Multimedica, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: alberto.corsini@unimi.it.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statins represent the elective lipid-lowering strategy in hyperlipidemic and high cardiovascular-risk patients. Despite excellent safety and tolerability, reversible muscle-related and dose-dependent adverse events may decrease a patient's compliance. Large meta-analyses, post-hoc and genetic studies showed that statins might increase the risk of new-onset diabetes (NOD), particularly in insulin-resistant, obese, old patients. Race, gender, concomitant medication, dose and treatment duration may also contribute to this effect. Based on this evidence, to warn against the possibility of statin-induced NOD or worsening glycemic control in patients with already established diabetes, FDA and EMA changed the labels of all the available statins in the USA and Europe. Recent meta-analyses and retrospective studies demonstrated that statins' diabetogenicity is a dose-related class effect, but the mechanism(s) is not understood. Among statins, only pravastatin and pitavastatin do not deteriorate glycemic parameters in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Interestingly, available data, obtained in small-scale, retrospective or single-center clinical studies, document that pitavastatin, while ameliorating lipid profile, seems protective against NOD. Beyond differences in pharmacokinetics between pitavastatin and the other statins (higher oral bioavailability, lower hepatic uptake), its consistent increases in plasma adiponectin documented in clinical studies may be causally connected with its effect on glucose metabolism. Adiponectin is a protein with antiatherosclerotic, anti-inflammatory and antidiabetogenic properties exerted on liver, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue and pancreatic beta cells. Further studies are required to confirm this unique property of pitavastatin and to understand the mechanism(s) leading to this effect.

Indexed as

AdiponectinAnimalsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsProtective FactorsQuinolinesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAdiponectinBiomarkersBlood GlucoseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorspitavastatinQuinolinesAdiponectinInsulin sensitivityPitavastatinStatinsType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

Identifiers

PMID25575403
OpenAlexW1996541505

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.