Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27039291›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2016

Efficacy and Tolerability of Evolocumab vs Ezetimibe in Patients With Muscle-Related Statin Intolerance: The GAUSS-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Steven E Nissen, Erik Stroes, Ricardo E Dent-Acosta, Robert S Rosenson, Sam J Lehman, Naveed Sattar, David Preiss, Eric Bruckert, Richard Ceška, Norman Lepor and 9 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01984424. Cited by 187 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
74.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01984424 phase3completed

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Evolocumab, Compared With Ezetimibe, in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects Unable to Tolerate an Effective Dose of a HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Due to Muscle Related Side Effects

Ran2013Enrolled511Registered outcomes24Posted comparisons24ConditionsHyperlipidemiaArmsAtorvastatin, Evolocumab, Ezetimibe, Placebo to atorvastatin, Placebo to Evolocumab
PMID 30073585other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
NCT04710368 phase4completedstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Evolocumab on Coronary Plaque Characteristics: a Multimodality Imaging Study

Ran2021Enrolled137Registered outcomes16Posted comparisons0ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsEvolocumab Injections
Open the trial in the graph
NCT04826354 phase4completedstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Ran2021Enrolled582Registered outcomes11Posted comparisons0ConditionsAtheroscleroses, CoronaryArmsRosuvastatin, rosuvastatin and ezetimibe
Open the trial in the graph
NCT06381947 phase4unknown statusstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Association With Anti-PCSK9 and Ezetimibe in Statin-intolerant Patients: a Randomized Crossover Trial

Ran2024Enrolled130Registered outcomes19Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Dyslipidemias, Lipid Metabolism Disorders, Statin Adverse ReactionArmsLipid-lowering therapy combination with PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe, Lipid-lowering therapy combination with PCSK9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid and ezetimibe
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 506 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Is a PCSK9 Inhibitor Right for Your Patient? A Review of Treatment Data for Individualized Therapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2022 · on this map
    Pooled it
  13. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · on this map
    Pooled it
  14. Guideline
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017 · on this map
    Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Trial

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Steven E NissenCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Erik StroesUniversity of Amsterdam Faculty of Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ricardo E Dent-AcostaAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
Robert S RosensonSchool of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Sam J LehmanFlinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Naveed SattarUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
David PreissClinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom8Epidemiological Services Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eric BruckertUniversity Hospital of Paris 6, Paris, France.
Richard CeškaCharles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic11General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Norman LeporDavid Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Christie M BallantyneBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ioanna Gouni-BertholdCenter for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Mary ElliottAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
Danielle M BrennanCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Scott M WassermanAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
Ransi SomaratneAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
Rob ScottAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.
Evan A SteinMetabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
GAUSS-3 Investigators
Amgen (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USBaylor College of Medicine · USFlinders University · AUGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLouisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center · USSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceMuscle-related statin intolerance is reported by 5% to 20% of patients.

objectiveTo identify patients with muscle symptoms confirmed by statin rechallenge and compare lipid-lowering efficacy for 2 nonstatin therapies, ezetimibe and evolocumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsTwo-stage randomized clinical trial including 511 adult patients with uncontrolled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and history of intolerance to 2 or more statins enrolled in 2013 and 2014 globally. Phase A used a 24-week crossover procedure with atorvastatin or placebo to identify patients having symptoms only with atorvastatin but not placebo. In phase B, after a 2-week washout, patients were randomized to ezetimibe or evolocumab for 24 weeks.

interventionsPhase A: atorvastatin (20 mg) vs placebo. Phase B: randomization 2:1 to subcutaneous evolocumab (420 mg monthly) or oral ezetimibe (10 mg daily). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Coprimary end points were the mean percent change in LDL-C level from baseline to the mean of weeks 22 and 24 levels and from baseline to week 24 levels.

resultsOf the 491 patients who entered phase A (mean age, 60.7 [SD, 10.2] years; 246 women [50.1%]; 170 with coronary heart disease [34.6%]; entry mean LDL-C level, 212.3 [SD, 67.9] mg/dL), muscle symptoms occurred in 209 of 491 (42.6%) while taking atorvastatin but not while taking placebo. Of these, 199 entered phase B, along with 19 who proceeded directly to phase B for elevated creatine kinase (N = 218, with 73 randomized to ezetimibe and 145 to evolocumab; entry mean LDL-C level, 219.9 [SD, 72] mg/dL). For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, LDL-C level with ezetimibe was 183.0 mg/dL; mean percent LDL-C change, -16.7% (95% CI, -20.5% to -12.9%), absolute change, -31.0 mg/dL and with evolocumab was 103.6 mg/dL; mean percent change, -54.5% (95% CI, -57.2% to -51.8%); absolute change, -106.8 mg/dL (P < .001). LDL-C level at week 24 with ezetimibe was 181.5 mg/dL; mean percent change, -16.7% (95% CI, -20.8% to -12.5%); absolute change, -31.2 mg/dL and with evolocumab was 104.1 mg/dL; mean percent change, -52.8% (95% CI, -55.8% to -49.8%); absolute change, -102.9 mg/dL (P < .001). For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, between-group difference in LDL-C was -37.8%; absolute difference, -75.8 mg/dL. For week 24, between-group difference in LDL-C was -36.1%; absolute difference, -71.7 mg/dL. Muscle symptoms were reported in 28.8% of ezetimibe-treated patients and 20.7% of evolocumab-treated patients (log-rank P = .17). Active study drug was stopped for muscle symptoms in 5 of 73 ezetimibe-treated patients (6.8%) and 1 of 145 evolocumab-treated patients (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with statin intolerance related to muscle-related adverse effects, the use of evolocumab compared with ezetimibe resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels after 24 weeks. Further studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01984424.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLCreatine KinaseCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEzetimibeFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaMaleAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLCreatine KinaseevolocumabEzetimibeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27039291
OpenAlexW2314193179

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.