Trial reportJAMA2016
Efficacy and Tolerability of Evolocumab vs Ezetimibe in Patients With Muscle-Related Statin Intolerance: The GAUSS-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01984424. Cited by 187 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Evolocumab, Compared With Ezetimibe, in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects Unable to Tolerate an Effective Dose of a HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Due to Muscle Related Side Effects
Effect of Evolocumab on Coronary Plaque Characteristics: a Multimodality Imaging Study
Open the trial in the graphEffects of High-dose StAtin Versus Low-dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms & on Reaching Target LDL-C Levels Among Elderly Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Association With Anti-PCSK9 and Ezetimibe in Statin-intolerant Patients: a Randomized Crossover Trial
Who cites it
187 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 506 citations in OpenAlex.
- 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Guideline
- Effects of Alirocumab and Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Mortality and LDL-C: Stratified According to the Baseline LDL-C Levels.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Association of lipid-lowering drugs with risk of sarcopenia: a drug target mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis.Human genomics · 2024Pooled it
- Quantitative assessment of baseline imbalances in evolocumab and alirocumab trials: a meta-epidemiological study.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative Muscle Tolerability of Different Types and Intensities of Statins: A Network Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody Versus Placebo/Ezetimibe on Atrial Fibrillation in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 26 Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023 · on this mapPooled it
- Intolerance upon statin rechallenge: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Is a PCSK9 Inhibitor Right for Your Patient? A Review of Treatment Data for Individualized Therapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Evaluating the Comparative Efficacy of Lipid-Lowering Therapies Added to Maximally Tolerated Statins for the Reduction of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · on this mapPooled it
- 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation · 2019 · on this mapGuideline
- Effects of monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 on clinical cardiovascular events : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Herz · 2019 · on this mapPooled it
- Introducing the 'Drucebo' effect in statin therapy: a systematic review of studies comparing reported rates of statin-associated muscle symptoms, under blinded and open-label conditions.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2018Pooled it
- Role of genetics in the prediction of statin-associated muscle symptoms and optimization of statin use and adherence.Cardiovascular research · 2018Pooled it
- PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017 · on this mapPooled it
- Association of baseline LDL-C with total and cardiovascular mortality in patients using proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical lipidology · on this mapPooled it
- Sex Differences in Statin Intolerance: Insights From the CLEAR Outcomes Trial.Clinical cardiology · 2026Trial
127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceMuscle-related statin intolerance is reported by 5% to 20% of patients.
objectiveTo identify patients with muscle symptoms confirmed by statin rechallenge and compare lipid-lowering efficacy for 2 nonstatin therapies, ezetimibe and evolocumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsTwo-stage randomized clinical trial including 511 adult patients with uncontrolled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and history of intolerance to 2 or more statins enrolled in 2013 and 2014 globally. Phase A used a 24-week crossover procedure with atorvastatin or placebo to identify patients having symptoms only with atorvastatin but not placebo. In phase B, after a 2-week washout, patients were randomized to ezetimibe or evolocumab for 24 weeks.
interventionsPhase A: atorvastatin (20 mg) vs placebo. Phase B: randomization 2:1 to subcutaneous evolocumab (420 mg monthly) or oral ezetimibe (10 mg daily). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Coprimary end points were the mean percent change in LDL-C level from baseline to the mean of weeks 22 and 24 levels and from baseline to week 24 levels.
resultsOf the 491 patients who entered phase A (mean age, 60.7 [SD, 10.2] years; 246 women [50.1%]; 170 with coronary heart disease [34.6%]; entry mean LDL-C level, 212.3 [SD, 67.9] mg/dL), muscle symptoms occurred in 209 of 491 (42.6%) while taking atorvastatin but not while taking placebo. Of these, 199 entered phase B, along with 19 who proceeded directly to phase B for elevated creatine kinase (N = 218, with 73 randomized to ezetimibe and 145 to evolocumab; entry mean LDL-C level, 219.9 [SD, 72] mg/dL). For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, LDL-C level with ezetimibe was 183.0 mg/dL; mean percent LDL-C change, -16.7% (95% CI, -20.5% to -12.9%), absolute change, -31.0 mg/dL and with evolocumab was 103.6 mg/dL; mean percent change, -54.5% (95% CI, -57.2% to -51.8%); absolute change, -106.8 mg/dL (P < .001). LDL-C level at week 24 with ezetimibe was 181.5 mg/dL; mean percent change, -16.7% (95% CI, -20.8% to -12.5%); absolute change, -31.2 mg/dL and with evolocumab was 104.1 mg/dL; mean percent change, -52.8% (95% CI, -55.8% to -49.8%); absolute change, -102.9 mg/dL (P < .001). For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, between-group difference in LDL-C was -37.8%; absolute difference, -75.8 mg/dL. For week 24, between-group difference in LDL-C was -36.1%; absolute difference, -71.7 mg/dL. Muscle symptoms were reported in 28.8% of ezetimibe-treated patients and 20.7% of evolocumab-treated patients (log-rank P = .17). Active study drug was stopped for muscle symptoms in 5 of 73 ezetimibe-treated patients (6.8%) and 1 of 145 evolocumab-treated patients (0.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with statin intolerance related to muscle-related adverse effects, the use of evolocumab compared with ezetimibe resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels after 24 weeks. Further studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01984424.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.