SynthesisPloS one2017

The Effectiveness of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Improving Glycaemic Control in Adults with Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Johanna Taylor, Brendon Stubbs, Catherine Hewitt, Ramzi A Ajjan, Sarah L Alderson, Simon Gilbody, Richard I G Holt, Prakash Hosali, Tom Hughes, Tarron Kayalackakom and 7 more

Open access · goldFull text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph read 4 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it finds no clear difference in 1. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

4numbers the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-0.430.420 · no effect
HbA1cbehavioural interventions vs usual care or placebono clear difference · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ 0.18-0.07 to 0.42
Both pharmacological (mean difference (MD), -0.11mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-0.19, -0.02], p = 0.02, n = 2536) and behavioural interventions (MD, -0.28mmol//L; 95% CI, [-0.43, -0.12], p<0.001, n = 956) were effective in lowering fasting glucose, but not HbA1c (pharmacological MD, -0.03%; 95% CI, [-0.12, 0.06], p = 0.52, n = 1515; behavioural MD, 0.18%; 95% CI, [-0.07, 0.42], p = 0.16, n = 140) compared with usual care or placebo.
Fasting glucosepharmacological interventions vs usual care or placebofavours the treatment · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -0.11-0.19 to -0.02
Both pharmacological (mean difference (MD), -0.11mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-0.19, -0.02], p = 0.02, n = 2536) and behavioural interventions (MD, -0.28mmol//L; 95% CI, [-0.43, -0.12], p<0.001, n = 956) were effective in lowering fasting glucose, but not HbA1c (pharmacological MD, -0.03%; 95% CI, [-0.12, 0.06], p = 0.52, n = 1515; behavioural MD, 0.18%; 95% CI, [-0.07, 0.42], p = 0.16, n = 140) compared with usual care or placebo.
HbA1cpharmacological interventions vs usual care or placebono clear difference · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -0.03-0.12 to 0.06
Both pharmacological (mean difference (MD), -0.11mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-0.19, -0.02], p = 0.02, n = 2536) and behavioural interventions (MD, -0.28mmol//L; 95% CI, [-0.43, -0.12], p<0.001, n = 956) were effective in lowering fasting glucose, but not HbA1c (pharmacological MD, -0.03%; 95% CI, [-0.12, 0.06], p = 0.52, n = 1515; behavioural MD, 0.18%; 95% CI, [-0.07, 0.42], p = 0.16, n = 140) compared with usual care or placebo.
Fasting glucosebehavioural interventions vs usual care or placebofavours the treatment · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -0.28-0.43 to -0.12
Both pharmacological (mean difference (MD), -0.11mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-0.19, -0.02], p = 0.02, n = 2536) and behavioural interventions (MD, -0.28mmol//L; 95% CI, [-0.43, -0.12], p<0.001, n = 956) were effective in lowering fasting glucose, but not HbA1c (pharmacological MD, -0.03%; 95% CI, [-0.12, 0.06], p = 0.52, n = 1515; behavioural MD, 0.18%; 95% CI, [-0.07, 0.42], p = 0.16, n = 140) compared with usual care or placebo.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Diet, exercise & lifestyle×glycemic control

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

5 readable studies in this cell: 4 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.99replicated · 2 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Guideline
  2. EPA guidance on lifestyle interventions for adults with severe mental illness: A meta-review of the evidence.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Metabolic Adverse Effects of Psychotropic Drug Therapy: A Systematic Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Review
  10. Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Genetics of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indian and Global Population: A Review.The Egyptian journal of medical human genetics · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna TaylorDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Brendon StubbsHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine HewittDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Ramzi A AjjanLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sarah L AldersonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-0495
Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Richard I G HoltHuman Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Prakash HosaliLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-126X
Tom HughesLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Tarron KayalackakomDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4062-2539
Ian KellarSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Helen LewisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2237-1369
Neda MahmoodiFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Kirstine McDermidUniversity of Leeds Library, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-5878
Robert D SmithDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Judy M WrightLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Najma SiddiqiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
University of York · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBBradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health 15/70/26Department of Health RP-DG-1214-10002
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

People with severe mental illness (SMI) have reduced life expectancy compared with the general population, which can be explained partly by their increased risk of diabetes. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for improving glycaemic control in people with SMI (PROSPERO registration: CRD42015015558). A systematic literature search was performed on 30/10/2015 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with SMI, with or without a diagnosis of diabetes that measured fasting blood glucose or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers. We used random effects meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness, and subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression to explore heterogeneity. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess risk of bias. We found 54 eligible RCTs in 4,392 adults (40 pharmacological, 13 behavioural, one mixed intervention). Data for meta-analysis were available from 48 RCTs (n = 4052). Both pharmacological (mean difference (MD), -0.11mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-0.19, -0.02], p = 0.02, n = 2536) and behavioural interventions (MD, -0.28mmol//L; 95% CI, [-0.43, -0.12], p<0.001, n = 956) were effective in lowering fasting glucose, but not HbA1c (pharmacological MD, -0.03%; 95% CI, [-0.12, 0.06], p = 0.52, n = 1515; behavioural MD, 0.18%; 95% CI, [-0.07, 0.42], p = 0.16, n = 140) compared with usual care or placebo. In subgroup analysis of pharmacological interventions, metformin and antipsychotic switching strategies improved HbA1c. Behavioural interventions of longer duration and those including repeated physical activity had greater effects on fasting glucose than those without these characteristics. Baseline levels of fasting glucose explained some of the heterogeneity in behavioural interventions but not in pharmacological interventions. Although the strength of the evidence is limited by inadequate trial design and reporting and significant heterogeneity, there is some evidence that behavioural interventions, antipsychotic switching, and metformin can lead to clinically important improvements in glycaemic measurements in adults with SMI.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusFastingGlycated HemoglobinHumansMental DisordersMetforminBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinMetformin

Identifiers

PMID28056018
PMCPMC5215855
OpenAlexW2571477512

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.