Evidence mapPaperPMID 32882902Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Low Dietary n-6/n-3 PUFA Ratio Regulates Meat Quality, Reduces Triglyceride Content, and Improves Fatty Acid Composition of Meat in Heigai Pigs.

Qiuyun Nong, Liyi Wang, Yanbing Zhou, Ye Sun, Wentao Chen, Jintang Xie, Xiaodong Zhu, Tizhong Shan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alpha-Linolenic Acid fromJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiuyun NongCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Liyi WangCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yanbing ZhouCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Ye SunCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Wentao ChenCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Jintang XieShandong Chunteng Food Co. Ltd., Zaozhuang 277500, China.
Xiaodong ZhuShandong Chunteng Food Co. Ltd., Zaozhuang 277500, China.
Tizhong ShanCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-414X
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFD0500405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation with different n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratios on growth performance, meat quality, and fatty acid profile in Heigai pigs. A total of 54 Heigai finishing pigs (body weight: 71.59 ± 2.16 kg) were randomly divided into three treatments with six replications (three pigs per replication) and fed diets containing different n-6/n-3 PUFA ratios: 8:1, 5:1, and 3:1. Pigs fed the dietary n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of 8:1 had the highest feed to gain ratio (

Indexed as

growth performanceHeigai pigmeat qualitypolyunsaturated fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID32882902
PMCPMC7552283
OpenAlexW3082837063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.