Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2025

The impact of metformin on kidney disease progression and mortality in diabetic patients using SGLT2 inhibitors: a real-world cohort study.

Timna Agur, Tali Steinmetz, Shira Goldman, Boris Zingerman, Dana Bielopolski, Eviatar Nesher, Ittai Fattal, Eshcar Meisel, Benaya Rozen-Zvi

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph read 6 numbers from its abstract, feeding 6 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports 6 associations that do not count as treatment evidence, such as HR 0.74 (0.64 to 0.84) for all-cause mortality. Cited by 12 papers.

6numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

All-cause mortalitymetformin and SGLT2 inhibitors vs SGLT2 inhibitors alonean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2d, ckdfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.740.64 to 0.84
Combination therapy with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.84), and composite kidney outcomes (aHR 0.65 95% CI 0.48-0.87) even after accounting for mortality as a competing risk (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9).
Severe acute kidney injury eventsmetformin and SGLT2 inhibitors vs SGLT2 inhibitors alonean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2d, ckdfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.720.54 to 0.96
Furthermore, combination therapy was associated with reduced risks of hospitalization (aHR 0.93 95% CI 0.87-0.99), severe acute kidney injury events (aHR 0.72 95% CI 0.54-0.96) and metabolic acidosis events (aHR 0.58 95% CI 0.4-0.83), compared with SGLT2 inhibitors alone.
Hospitalizationmetformin and SGLT2 inhibitors vs SGLT2 inhibitors alonean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2d, ckdfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.930.87 to 0.99
Furthermore, combination therapy was associated with reduced risks of hospitalization (aHR 0.93 95% CI 0.87-0.99), severe acute kidney injury events (aHR 0.72 95% CI 0.54-0.96) and metabolic acidosis events (aHR 0.58 95% CI 0.4-0.83), compared with SGLT2 inhibitors alone.
Composite kidney outcomes (accounting for mortality as a competing risk)metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors vs SGLT2 inhibitors alonean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2d, ckdfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.670.50 to 0.90
Combination therapy with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.84), and composite kidney outcomes (aHR 0.65 95% CI 0.48-0.87) even after accounting for mortality as a competing risk (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9).
Composite kidney outcomesmetformin and SGLT2 inhibitors vs SGLT2 inhibitors alonean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2d, ckdfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.650.48 to 0.87
Combination therapy with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.84), and composite kidney outcomes (aHR 0.65 95% CI 0.48-0.87) even after accounting for mortality as a competing risk (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9).
Metabolic acidosis eventsmetformin and SGLT2 inhibitors vs SGLT2 inhibitors alonean association or prognostic statement, not a treatment comparison · t2d, ckdfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.580.40 to 0.83
Furthermore, combination therapy was associated with reduced risks of hospitalization (aHR 0.93 95% CI 0.87-0.99), severe acute kidney injury events (aHR 0.72 95% CI 0.54-0.96) and metabolic acidosis events (aHR 0.58 95% CI 0.4-0.83), compared with SGLT2 inhibitors alone.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×all-cause mortality

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50one trial · 1 family supports, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT000387272,779 enrolled · 1996
HR 0.990.79 to 1.25

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Metformin×kidney outcomes

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.25no deciding trial · 0 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Metformin×adverse events & safety

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

22 readable studies in this cell: 9 favour the treatment, 8 find no difference, 5 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.27contested · 4 families support, 11 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT017190031,413 enrolled · 2012
Adjusted mean -0.72-0.95 to -0.48
NCT018093271,186 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.40-0.59 to -0.21
NCT022730501,136 enrolled · 2014
Δ -8.90-13.3 to -4.50
NCT01126580807 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.22-0.36 to -0.08
NCT01023581784 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.67-0.96 to -0.37
NCT00386100688 enrolled · 2006
Δ 1.47-14.8 to 20.8
NCT01217073685 enrolled · 2010
Δ 1.00-9.80 to 13.1
NCT01890122647 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.68-0.89 to -0.47
NCT00727857600 enrolled · 2007
Δ 0.860.51 to 1.22
NCT01958671461 enrolled · 2013
Δ -2.60-13.1 to 8.10
NCT00328172302 enrolled · 2006
Δ -0.85-1.10 to -0.59
NCT01485614200 enrolled · 2012
Δ 2.40-10.0 to 14.9

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

SGLT2 inhibitors×all-cause mortality

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

13 readable studies in this cell: 5 favour the treatment, 6 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 5 families support, 4 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
1 · no effect
NCT0546531762,197 enrolled · 2022
HR 0.750.65 to 0.86
NCT0399313226,774 enrolled · 2018
HR 0.990.83 to 1.18
NCT0173053417,190 enrolled · 2013
HR 0.930.84 to 1.03
NCT045096746,522 enrolled · 2020
HR 0.900.76 to 1.06
NCT036192136,263 enrolled · 2018
HR 0.820.73 to 0.92
NCT030579515,988 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.790.69 to 0.90
NCT019897545,813 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.720.55 to 0.94
NCT020657914,401 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.700.59 to 0.82
NCT010326294,330 enrolled · 2009
HR 0.930.78 to 1.12
NCT030579773,730 enrolled · 2017
HR 0.750.65 to 0.86
NCT043636972,401 enrolled · 2020
HR 0.860.68 to 1.08
NCT04157751530 enrolled · 2020
Stratified Win Ratio 1.361.09 to 1.68

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

SGLT2 inhibitors×kidney outcomes

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

13 readable studies in this cell: 10 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.89established · 8 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
1 · no effect
NCT02864914333,580 enrolled · 2016
IRR 0.690.45 to 1.05
NCT0546531762,197 enrolled · 2022
HR 0.750.65 to 0.86
NCT0173053417,190 enrolled · 2013
HR 0.760.67 to 0.87
NCT030579515,988 enrolled · 2017
Treatment by time interaction 1.360.86 to 1.86
NCT019897545,813 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.640.57 to 0.73
NCT020657914,401 enrolled · 2014
HR 0.700.59 to 0.82
NCT010326294,330 enrolled · 2009
OR 0.800.67 to 0.97
NCT030579773,730 enrolled · 2017
Treatment by time interaction 1.730.67 to 2.80

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

SGLT2 inhibitors×adverse events & safety

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

38 readable studies in this cell: 18 favour the treatment, 19 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.00contested · 0 families support, 26 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT011374742,996 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.46-0.59 to -0.33
NCT017190031,413 enrolled · 2012
Adjusted mean -0.33-0.56 to -0.10
NCT020991101,233 enrolled · 2014
Δ 1.40-7.40 to 10.1
NCT018093271,186 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.46-0.66 to -0.27
NCT01649297983 enrolled · 2012
Δ -0.61-0.79 to -0.44
NCT02580591977 enrolled · 2015
Δ -0.28-0.46 to -0.11
NCT02414958730 enrolled · 2015
Δ -0.54-0.66 to -0.41
NCT01381900678 enrolled · 2011
Δ -0.51-0.64 to -0.37
NCT02033889621 enrolled · 2013
Δ 1.50-2.10 to 5.40
NCT02532855614 enrolled · 2015
Δ -2.80-10.7 to 5.10
NCT02630706506 enrolled · 2015
Δ -6.00-16.5 to 4.60
NCT02036515464 enrolled · 2014
Δ -5.70-16.5 to 5.20

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Timna AgurDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel. Timna.Agur@clalit.org.il.
Tali SteinmetzDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Shira GoldmanDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Boris ZingermanDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Dana BielopolskiDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Eviatar NesherFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Ittai FattalDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Eshcar MeiselDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Benaya Rozen-ZviDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Ze'ev Jabotinsky St 39, Petah Tikva, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundSelecting the optimal first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes is essential for achieving glycemic control and providing cardio-renal protection, though the combined benefits of metformin with SGLT2 inhibitors, remain uncertain.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed data from Clalit Health Services (2016-2021), to compare outcome in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with SGLT2 inhibitors alone versus in combination with metformin. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Primary outcomes were a composite kidney outcome (40% decline in eGFR, or progression to ESRD), and all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included hospitalizations, acute kidney injury and metabolic acidosis.

resultsThe study included 45,545 patients, with 6774 patients in each group following propensity score matching. The median follow-up time was 1166 days. Combination therapy with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.84), and composite kidney outcomes (aHR 0.65 95% CI 0.48-0.87) even after accounting for mortality as a competing risk (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9). Furthermore, combination therapy was associated with reduced risks of hospitalization (aHR 0.93 95% CI 0.87-0.99), severe acute kidney injury events (aHR 0.72 95% CI 0.54-0.96) and metabolic acidosis events (aHR 0.58 95% CI 0.4-0.83), compared with SGLT2 inhibitors alone.

conclusionsPatients receiving combination therapy with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors showed significantly reduced risks of kidney disease progression and mortality compared to those treated with SGLT2 inhibitors alone. These findings support the use of metformin with SGLT2 inhibitors as a first-line treatment strategy for type 2 diabetes irrespective of glycemic control or cardio-renal risk factors.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesKidneyKidney Failure, ChronicMetforminSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAgedBiomarkersDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleBiomarkersBlood GlucoseMetforminSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsAll-cause mortalityChronic kidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusDiabetic kidney diseaseMetforminSGLT2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40022102
PMCPMC11871758

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.