Who was studied, and how
One number in the abstract
Where each one falls
Where it lands on the map
people with type 2 diabetes, in this paper
Already taking CGM use, or nottheir own situation, not assigned
on CGM use
CGM non-users
CGM use went with lower a1c change−0.45
correlation, not a testthe abstract, start to end
CGM use was associated with a -0.45% greater A1c change among CGM …
← favours treatmentfavours comparator →
could be chanceNo interval given · direction only, strength unknown
A1c changeCGM use vs CGM non-users
−0.45
Digital & care-deliveryGlycemic control
1 / 4