SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025
IDeglira vs insulin degludec for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph read 5 numbers from its abstract, feeding 3 cells of the map: it . Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Treatment with IDegLira resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c (MD -0.79%, 95%CI: -1.03% to -0.54%), body weight (MD -1.62 kg, 95% CI: -2.13 kg to -1.11 kg), fasting plasma glucose (MD -0.45 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.77 mmol/L to -0.14 mmol/L), self-measured plasma glucose (MD -1.00 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.42 mmol/L to -0.59 mmol/L), and systolic blood pressure (MD -2.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.63 mmHg to -0.82 mmHg).
Treatment with IDegLira resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c (MD -0.79%, 95%CI: -1.03% to -0.54%), body weight (MD -1.62 kg, 95% CI: -2.13 kg to -1.11 kg), fasting plasma glucose (MD -0.45 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.77 mmol/L to -0.14 mmol/L), self-measured plasma glucose (MD -1.00 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.42 mmol/L to -0.59 mmol/L), and systolic blood pressure (MD -2.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.63 mmHg to -0.82 mmHg).
Treatment with IDegLira resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c (MD -0.79%, 95%CI: -1.03% to -0.54%), body weight (MD -1.62 kg, 95% CI: -2.13 kg to -1.11 kg), fasting plasma glucose (MD -0.45 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.77 mmol/L to -0.14 mmol/L), self-measured plasma glucose (MD -1.00 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.42 mmol/L to -0.59 mmol/L), and systolic blood pressure (MD -2.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.63 mmHg to -0.82 mmHg).
Treatment with IDegLira resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c (MD -0.79%, 95%CI: -1.03% to -0.54%), body weight (MD -1.62 kg, 95% CI: -2.13 kg to -1.11 kg), fasting plasma glucose (MD -0.45 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.77 mmol/L to -0.14 mmol/L), self-measured plasma glucose (MD -1.00 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.42 mmol/L to -0.59 mmol/L), and systolic blood pressure (MD -2.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.63 mmHg to -0.82 mmHg).
Treatment with IDegLira resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c (MD -0.79%, 95%CI: -1.03% to -0.54%), body weight (MD -1.62 kg, 95% CI: -2.13 kg to -1.11 kg), fasting plasma glucose (MD -0.45 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.77 mmol/L to -0.14 mmol/L), self-measured plasma glucose (MD -1.00 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.42 mmol/L to -0.59 mmol/L), and systolic blood pressure (MD -2.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.63 mmHg to -0.82 mmHg).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Insulin×glycemic control
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →40 readable studies in this cell: 15 favour the treatment, 14 find no difference, 14 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Insulin×body weight & composition
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →12 readable studies in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 10 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Insulin×blood pressure
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety profiles of IDegLira versus insulin degludec in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: A comprehensive search was systematically conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until March 11, 2025. The search focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared IDegLira with insulin degludec in adult patients with T2D. The primary outcomes of interest included change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 software. Results: A total of six eligible RCTs, encompassing 3,393 patients (2,075 receiving IDegLira and 1,318 receiving insulin degludec), were included in the analysis. Treatment with IDegLira resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c (MD -0.79%, 95%CI: -1.03% to -0.54%), body weight (MD -1.62 kg, 95% CI: -2.13 kg to -1.11 kg), fasting plasma glucose (MD -0.45 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.77 mmol/L to -0.14 mmol/L), self-measured plasma glucose (MD -1.00 mmol/L, 95% CI: -1.42 mmol/L to -0.59 mmol/L), and systolic blood pressure (MD -2.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.63 mmHg to -0.82 mmHg). In comparison to insulin degludec, IDegLira demonstrated superior blood glucose control, as evidenced by a higher proportion of patients achieving HbA1c levels below 7.0% and 6.5%, as well as those achieving these targets without weight gain and severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemic episodes. Additionally, patients treated with IDegLira required significantly lower daily insulin doses. Notably, the risk of severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycemia, adverse events, and severe adverse events was comparable between IDegLira and insulin degludec. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides compelling evidence that IDegLira offers superior glycemic control and more favorable effects on body weight compared to insulin degludec, while maintaining a comparable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.