SynthesisBMJ open2015

An investigation into the therapeutic effects of statins with metformin on polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Jie Sun, Yang Yuan, Rongrong Cai, Haixia Sun, Yi Zhou, Pin Wang, Rong Huang, Wenqing Xia, Shaohua Wang

Open access · goldFull text readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph read 7 numbers from its abstract, feeding 4 cells of the map: it finds no clear difference in 1. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

7numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-3.361.060 · no effect
Fasting insulincombined therapy vs metformin aloneno clear difference · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -0.92-2.07 to 0.24
However, the combined therapy fails to reduce fasting insulin (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -2.07 to 0.24; p=0.120), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SMD -1.15; 95% CI -3.36 to 1.06; p=0.309) and total testosterone (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.29 to 0.05; p=0.061).

The authors add: However, the combined therapy fails to reduce fasting insulin (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -2.07 to 0.24; p=0.120), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SMD -1.15; 95% CI -3.36 to 1.06; p=0.309) and total testosterone (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.29 to 0.05; p=0.061).

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistancecombined therapy vs metformin aloneno clear difference · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -1.15-3.36 to 1.06
However, the combined therapy fails to reduce fasting insulin (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -2.07 to 0.24; p=0.120), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SMD -1.15; 95% CI -3.36 to 1.06; p=0.309) and total testosterone (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.29 to 0.05; p=0.061).

The authors add: However, the combined therapy fails to reduce fasting insulin (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -2.07 to 0.24; p=0.120), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SMD -1.15; 95% CI -3.36 to 1.06; p=0.309) and total testosterone (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.29 to 0.05; p=0.061).

Total testosteronecombined therapy vs metformin aloneno clear difference · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -1.12-2.29 to 0.05
However, the combined therapy fails to reduce fasting insulin (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -2.07 to 0.24; p=0.120), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SMD -1.15; 95% CI -3.36 to 1.06; p=0.309) and total testosterone (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.29 to 0.05; p=0.061).

The authors add: However, the combined therapy fails to reduce fasting insulin (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -2.07 to 0.24; p=0.120), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SMD -1.15; 95% CI -3.36 to 1.06; p=0.309) and total testosterone (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.29 to 0.05; p=0.061).

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

C reactive proteincombination of statins and metformin vs metformin alonecomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -0.91-1.81 to -0.02
The combination of statins and metformin decreases the levels of C reactive protein (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.91; 95% CI -1.81 to -0.02; p=0.046), triglyceride (SMD -1.37; 95% CI -2.46 to -0.28; p=0.014), total cholesterol (SMD -1.28; 95% CI -1.59 to -0.97; p=0.000) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (SMD -0.74; 95% CI -1.03 to -0.44; p=0.000).
Triglyceridecombination of statins and metformin vs metformin alonecomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -1.37-2.46 to -0.28
The combination of statins and metformin decreases the levels of C reactive protein (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.91; 95% CI -1.81 to -0.02; p=0.046), triglyceride (SMD -1.37; 95% CI -2.46 to -0.28; p=0.014), total cholesterol (SMD -1.28; 95% CI -1.59 to -0.97; p=0.000) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (SMD -0.74; 95% CI -1.03 to -0.44; p=0.000).
Total cholesterolcombination of statins and metformin vs metformin alonecomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -1.28-1.59 to -0.97
The combination of statins and metformin decreases the levels of C reactive protein (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.91; 95% CI -1.81 to -0.02; p=0.046), triglyceride (SMD -1.37; 95% CI -2.46 to -0.28; p=0.014), total cholesterol (SMD -1.28; 95% CI -1.59 to -0.97; p=0.000) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (SMD -0.74; 95% CI -1.03 to -0.44; p=0.000).
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterolcombination of statins and metformin vs metformin alonecomparator not stated · dyslipidemia, t2dfeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -0.74-1.03 to -0.44
The combination of statins and metformin decreases the levels of C reactive protein (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.91; 95% CI -1.81 to -0.02; p=0.046), triglyceride (SMD -1.37; 95% CI -2.46 to -0.28; p=0.014), total cholesterol (SMD -1.28; 95% CI -1.59 to -0.97; p=0.000) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (SMD -0.74; 95% CI -1.03 to -0.44; p=0.000).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Insulin×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 13 favour the treatment, 14 find no difference, 14 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 9 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT036893742,274 enrolled · 2018
Δ -0.29-0.38 to -0.20
NCT037306622,002 enrolled · 2018
Δ -0.99-1.13 to -0.86
NCT013360231,663 enrolled · 2011
Treatment contrast -0.64-0.75 to -0.53
NCT038829701,444 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.86-1.00 to -0.72
NCT045379231,428 enrolled · 2020
Δ -1.10-1.24 to -0.97
NCT032680051,264 enrolled · 2017
Δ -0.04-0.11 to 0.03
NCT020581471,170 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.78-0.90 to -0.67
NCT021289321,089 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.81-0.96 to -0.67
NCT009606611,036 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.04-0.18 to 0.11
NCT00856986987 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.52-0.68 to -0.36
NCT01117350978 enrolled · 2010
Δ 2.54-3.88 to 8.93
NCT03214380933 enrolled · 2017
Δ 0.06-0.05 to 0.16

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Insulin×inflammation & biomarkers

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.

Belief with this paperNo claim has been compiled for this cell yet.

Metformin×lipids

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

10 readable studies in this cell: 4 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 3 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.01-0.18 to 0.15
NCT00386100688 enrolled · 2006
Δ -11.3-20.6 to -0.90
NCT00727857600 enrolled · 2007
Δ 23.4-44.6 to 91.4
NCT00868790118 enrolled · 2009
Δ -3.90-10.2 to 2.30
NCT0158944577 enrolled · 2008
Δ -9.06-88.0 to 118

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Statins×lipids

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

38 readable studies in this cell: 25 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 8 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 21 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT002899002,340 enrolled · 2006
Δ -13.2-16.8 to -9.60
reduced -66.0-73.0 to -58.0
NCT02546323543 enrolled · 2015
Δ -35.5-40.2 to -30.7
NCT01678820299 enrolled · 2012
Δ 0.50-4.80 to 5.80
NCT01218204287 enrolled · 2010
Δ 5.47-15.7 to 26.7
NCT0093525931 enrolled · 2009
Δ -51.7
reductions -33.6-38.8 to -28.4

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of atorvastatin on testosterone levels.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. The Effect of Statins on Levels of Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Dysregulated Liver Metabolism and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Pleiotropic effects of statins: new therapeutic targets in drug design.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2016
    Review
  17. Targets to treat metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2015
    Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie SunDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Yang YuanDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Rongrong CaiDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Haixia SunDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Pin WangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Rong HuangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Wenqing XiaDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Shaohua WangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

objectivesTo investigate the therapeutic effects of statins with metformin on polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). SETTINGS: Endocrinology department.

participantsMEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until October 2014. Studies comparing statins and placebo, as well as the combination of statins and metformin and metformin alone, were included in the analysis.

interventionsData were independently extracted by two researchers; any convergence was resolved by a third reviewer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The following properties were extracted from the qualified trials to identify the effects of statins: clinical variables, metabolic characteristics, hormone outcomes, sign of inflammation, glucose parameters and insulin outcomes.

resultsData from four trials comparing statin and metformin with metformin alone were analysed. The combination of statins and metformin decreases the levels of C reactive protein (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.91; 95% CI -1.81 to -0.02; p=0.046), triglyceride (SMD -1.37; 95% CI -2.46 to -0.28; p=0.014), total cholesterol (SMD -1.28; 95% CI -1.59 to -0.97; p=0.000) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (SMD -0.74; 95% CI -1.03 to -0.44; p=0.000). However, the combined therapy fails to reduce fasting insulin (SMD -0.92; 95% CI -2.07 to 0.24; p=0.120), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SMD -1.15; 95% CI -3.36 to 1.06; p=0.309) and total testosterone (SMD -1.12; 95% CI -2.29 to 0.05; p=0.061). Analysis of the five trials comparing statin with placebo shows that statin monotherapy reduces LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride and total cholesterol.

conclusionsCombined statin and metformin therapy can improve lipid and inflammation parameters, but cannot effectively improve insulin sensitivity and reduce hyperandrogenism in women with PCOS. A large-scale randomised controlled study must be conducted to ascertain the long-term effects of the therapy.

Indexed as

Cholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin ResistanceMetforminPolycystic Ovary SyndromeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTestosteroneTriglyceridesCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminTestosteroneTriglyceridesGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)

Identifiers

PMID25818277
PMCPMC4386233
OpenAlexW2049446792

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.