Trial reportJAMA2021

Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Domenica Rubino, Niclas Abrahamsson, Melanie Davies, Dan Hesse, Frank L Greenway, Camilla Jensen, Ildiko Lingvay, Ofri Mosenzon, Julio Rosenstock, Miguel A Rubio and 5 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it supports the treatment in 1. It reports registered trial NCT03548987. Cited by 627 papers, 22 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
627citing papers in PubMed, 22 pooled it
106.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-16.00 · no effect
Body weight & compositionfavours the treatment · against placebo · obesity, hypertensionfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -14.8-16.0 to -13.5P < .001
With continued semaglutide, mean body weight change from week 20 to week 68 was -7.9% vs +6.9% with the switch to placebo (difference, -14.8 [95% CI, -16.0 to -13.5] percentage points; P < .001).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GLP-1 receptor agonists×body weight & composition

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 83 favour the treatment, 15 find no difference, 11 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.90replicated · 64 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.90This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
This paper902 enrolled · 2018
Δ -14.8-16.0 to -13.5
NCT012722193,731 enrolled · 2011
Δ -5.39-5.82 to -4.95
Δ -17.3-18.1 to -16.6
NCT017204463,297 enrolled · 2013
Δ -2.95-3.47 to -2.44
NCT035489351,961 enrolled · 2018
Δ -12.4-13.4 to -11.5
NCT039879191,879 enrolled · 2019
Δ -1.70-2.60 to -0.70
NCT026078651,864 enrolled · 2016
Δ -2.50-3.00 to -2.00
NCT056467061,407 enrolled · 2023
Δ -14.8-16.2 to -13.4
NCT018365231,398 enrolled · 2013
Δ -4.90-5.65 to -4.16
NCT035527571,210 enrolled · 2018
Δ -6.21-7.28 to -5.15
NCT007344741,202 enrolled · 2008
Δ -1.50-2.08 to -0.92
Δ -10.4-11.2 to -9.50
NCT020581471,170 enrolled · 2014
Δ 14.38.37 to 20.3
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03548987 phase3completed

Effect and Safety of Semaglutide 2.4 mg Once-weekly in Subjects With Overweight or Obesity Who Have Reached Target Dose During run-in Period

Ran2018Enrolled902Registered outcomes37Posted comparisons2ConditionsMetabolism and Nutrition Disorder, ObesityArmsPlacebo, semaglutide
PMID 32441473other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
NCT06287307 phase4not yet recruitingstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Semaglutide 2.4mg for Low Responders After Bariatric Surgery

Ran2024Enrolled152Registered outcomes55Posted comparisons0ConditionsObesity, Obesity, Morbid, Weight GainArmsPlacebo, Semaglutide 2.4 MG/0.75 ML Subcutaneous Solution [WEGOVY]
Open the trial in the graph
NCT07462663 phase4not yet recruitingstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

SHAPE-ENDO (Strategic Hormonal Approach & Prehabilitation in Endometrial Cancer): An Open-Label, Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Standard Immediate Surgery Versus a Multimodal Metabolic Optimization and Prehabilitation Strategy Before Surgery in Patients With Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia or Low-Risk Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer and BMI ≥40 kg/m²

Ran2027Enrolled80Registered outcomes34Posted comparisons0ConditionsAtypical Endometrial Hyperplasia, Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Carcinoma Stage I, BMI>40, Endometrial CancerArmsDietetic-Nutritional intervention, Endometrial Biopsy With or Without Hysteroscopy, GLP-1 receptor agonist, Levonorgestrel IUD (Lng-IUD), Oral Progestins
Open the trial in the graph
NCT07513168 phase4recruitingstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Semaglutide for Weight Loss and Cardiometabolic Improvement in Obese Pakistani Adults Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Single-Arm Open-Label Single-Center Trial

Ran2025Enrolled60Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiometabolic Risk Factors, Obesity, Weight ReductionArmsLocally available low-dose semaglutide (0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1 mg)
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

627 citing papers in PubMed, 22 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

567 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Domenica RubinoWashington Center for Weight Management, Arlington, Virginia.
Niclas AbrahamssonEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Melanie DaviesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England.
Dan HesseNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Frank L GreenwayPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge.
Camilla JensenNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Ildiko LingvayDepartments of Internal Medicine/Endocrinology and Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Ofri MosenzonDiabetes Unit, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Julio RosenstockDallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas.
Miguel A RubioDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Gottfried RudofskyDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Kantonsspital Olten, Olten, Switzerland.
Sayeh TadayonNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Thomas A WaddenDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Dror DickerInternal Medicine Department and Obesity Clinic, Hasharon Hospital-Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
STEP 4 Investigators
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKDallas Diabetes Research Center · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESKantonsschule Olten · CHPennington Biomedical Research Center · USTel Aviv University · ILUppsala University · SEWashington Center for Weight Management and Research · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science CenterU54GM104940 · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · 2025 to 2025
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Importance: The effect of continuing vs withdrawing treatment with semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, on weight loss maintenance in people with overweight or obesity is unknown. Objective: To compare continued once-weekly treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, with switch to placebo for weight maintenance (both with lifestyle intervention) in adults with overweight or obesity after a 20-week run-in with subcutaneous semaglutide titrated to 2.4 mg weekly. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, 68-week phase 3a withdrawal study conducted at 73 sites in 10 countries from June 2018 to March 2020 in adults with body mass index of at least 30 (or ≥27 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity) and without diabetes. Interventions: A total of 902 participants received once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide during run-in. After 20 weeks (16 weeks of dose escalation; 4 weeks of maintenance dose), 803 participants (89.0%) who reached the 2.4-mg/wk semaglutide maintenance dose were randomized (2:1) to 48 weeks of continued subcutaneous semaglutide (n = 535) or switched to placebo (n = 268), plus lifestyle intervention in both groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percent change in body weight from week 20 to week 68; confirmatory secondary end points were changes in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and physical functioning (assessed using the Short Form 36 Version 2 Health Survey, Acute Version [SF-36]). Results: Among 803 study participants who completed the 20-week run-in period (with a mean weight loss of 10.6%) and were randomized (mean age, 46 [SD, 12] years; 634 [79%] women; mean body weight, 107.2 kg [SD, 22.7 kg]), 787 participants (98.0%) completed the trial and 741 (92.3%) completed treatment. With continued semaglutide, mean body weight change from week 20 to week 68 was -7.9% vs +6.9% with the switch to placebo (difference, -14.8 [95% CI, -16.0 to -13.5] percentage points; P < .001). Waist circumference (-9.7 cm [95% CI, -10.9 to -8.5 cm]), systolic blood pressure (-3.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -5.8 to -2.0 mm Hg]), and SF-36 physical functioning score (2.5 [95% CI, 1.6-3.3]) also improved with continued subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo (all P < .001). Gastrointestinal events were reported in 49.1% of participants who continued subcutaneous semaglutide vs 26.1% with placebo; similar proportions discontinued treatment because of adverse events with continued semaglutide (2.4%) and placebo (2.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with overweight or obesity who completed a 20-week run-in period with subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg once weekly, maintaining treatment with semaglutide compared with switching to placebo resulted in continued weight loss over the following 48 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548987.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Obesity AgentsBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like PeptidesHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightSemaglutideWaist CircumferenceWeight LossAnti-Obesity AgentsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like PeptidesSemaglutide

Identifiers

PMID33755728
PMCPMC7988425
OpenAlexW3138431202

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.