Trial reportLancet (London, England)

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Helen M Colhoun, D John Betteridge, Paul N Durrington, Graham A Hitman, H Andrew W Neil, Shona J Livingstone, Margaret J Thomason, Michael I Mackness, Valentine Charlton-Menys, John H Fuller and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England). The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it supports the treatment in 1. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,010 papers, 31 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
1,010citing papers in PubMed, 31 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-52.00 · no effect
Cardiovascular eventsfavours the treatment · against placebo · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
reduction -37.0-52.0 to -17.0p=0.001
Median duration of follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 3.0-4.7). 127 patients allocated placebo (2.46 per 100 person-years at risk) and 83 allocated atorvastatin (1.54 per 100 person-years at risk) had at least one major cardiovascular event (rate reduction 37% [95% CI -52 to -17], p=0.001).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×cardiovascular events

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

30 readable studies in this cell: 18 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.86replicated · 12 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.85This paper moves it by +0.01.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
This paper
reduction -37.0-52.0 to -17.0
Δ 0.85-0.70 to 2.41
NCT002899002,340 enrolled · 2006
Δ -0.10-0.40 to 0.60
NCT01294683977 enrolled · 2011
Δ 0.00-0.97 to 0.97
NCT00728988499 enrolled · 2008
Δ 1.00-7.30 to 9.30
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02490124 completednot on this map

The Effect of Type 1 Diabetes on Pan-Arterial Vascular Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Humans

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2014 to 2015Enrolled7ConditionsDiabetes Type 1
NCT03174288 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Fitness and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade on Vascular Dysfunction in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2015 to 2019Enrolled32ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsExercise, Spironolactone
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,010 citing papers in PubMed, 31 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Benefits and Risks of Antihyperlipidemic Medication in Adults with Different Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Based on the Number Needed to Treat.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024 · on this map
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. The association of statin therapy and cancer: a meta-analysis.Lipids in health and disease · 2023 · on this map
    Pooled it
  16. Guideline
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

950 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Helen M ColhounEURODIAB, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK. helen.colhoun@ucd.ie
D John Betteridge
Paul N Durrington
Graham A Hitman
H Andrew W Neil
Shona J Livingstone
Margaret J Thomason
Michael I Mackness
Valentine Charlton-Menys
John H Fuller
CARDS investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundType 2 diabetes is associated with a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but the role of lipid-lowering therapy with statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes is inadequately defined. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of atorvastatin 10 mg daily for primary prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes without high concentrations of LDL-cholesterol.

methods2838 patients aged 40-75 years in 132 centres in the UK and Ireland were randomised to placebo (n=1410) or atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n=1428). Study entrants had no documented previous history of cardiovascular disease, an LDL-cholesterol concentration of 4.14 mmol/L or lower, a fasting triglyceride amount of 6.78 mmol/L or less, and at least one of the following: retinopathy, albuminuria, current smoking, or hypertension. The primary endpoint was time to first occurrence of the following: acute coronary heart disease events, coronary revascularisation, or stroke. Analysis was by intention to treat.

findingsThe trial was terminated 2 years earlier than expected because the prespecified early stopping rule for efficacy had been met. Median duration of follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 3.0-4.7). 127 patients allocated placebo (2.46 per 100 person-years at risk) and 83 allocated atorvastatin (1.54 per 100 person-years at risk) had at least one major cardiovascular event (rate reduction 37% [95% CI -52 to -17], p=0.001). Treatment would be expected to prevent at least 37 major vascular events per 1000 such people treated for 4 years. Assessed separately, acute coronary heart disease events were reduced by 36% (-55 to -9), coronary revascularisations by 31% (-59 to 16), and rate of stroke by 48% (-69 to -11). Atorvastatin reduced the death rate by 27% (-48 to 1, p=0.059). No excess of adverse events was noted in the atorvastatin group.

interpretationAtorvastatin 10 mg daily is safe and efficacious in reducing the risk of first cardiovascular disease events, including stroke, in patients with type 2 diabetes without high LDL-cholesterol. No justification is available for having a particular threshold level of LDL-cholesterol as the sole arbiter of which patients with type 2 diabetes should receive statins. The debate about whether all people with this disorder warrant statin treatment should now focus on whether any patients are at sufficiently low risk for this treatment to be withheld.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Double-Blind MethodFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPyrrolesAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinCholesterol, LDLHeptanoic AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrroles

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.